Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
168. _Descent of the Polycyttaria._--The polyzootic or colonial Radiolaria,
which we unite in the group Polycyttaria (sometimes known as "Sphærozoea"),
belong without doubt to the legion SPUMELLARIA, for they possess all the
peculiarities by which these PERIPYLEA are distinguished from the other
legions of the Radiolaria. Only the morphological position of the
Polycyttaria in that legion, and their phylogenetic relation to the
monozootic or solitary SPUMELLARIA, can be variously interpreted. The three
families which we distinguish among the Polycyttaria are so closely related
to three different families of the Monocyttaria, that they may be directly
derived from them by the formation of colonies. According to this
_triphyletic hypothesis_ the social skeletonless Collozoida (Pl. 3) would
be descended from the solitary Thalassicollida (Pl. 1), the polyzootic
Sphærozoida with a Beloid skeleton (Pl. 4) from the monozootic
{cxii}Thalassosphærida (Pl. 2), and the colonial Collosphærida with a
Sphæroid skeleton (Pls. 5-8) from the solitary Ethmosphærida (Pl. 12, &c.).
Many species of monozootic and polyzootic forms in all three groups are so
alike that they can only be distinguished by the fact that the one series
are colonial, the others solitary. On the other hand, there are some
reasons which would justify a monophyletic hypothesis for the Polycyttaria,
_e.g._, the precocious nuclear division; in this case it would be most
natural to hold that the Sphærozoida and Collosphærida have arisen as two
diverging branches from the Collozoida, whilst the latter are nothing else
than colonial Thalassicollida.
169. _Phylogeny of the Acantharia._--The legion ACANTHARIA or ACTIPYLEA is
distinguished by its peculiar acanthin skeleton, which develops
centrogenously, as well as by the disposition in groups of the pores in its
central capsule, and its excentric usually precocious nucleus; it is thus
so different from all other Radiolaria as undoubtedly to furnish,
phylogenetically considered, an independent stem (§ 7). This stem is only
connected at the root by _Actinelius_ with the primitive form of the
SPUMELLARIA, _Actissa_. The stem is monophyletic, since all the forms
belonging to it may be derived without violence from _Actinelius_ as a
common primitive form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account