Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
The legion SPUMELLARIA vel PERIPYLEA, in the extent here defined, was
constituted by me in 1883 in my paper on Die Ordnungen der Radiolarien.[2]
I propose to retain for this legion either the name SPUMELLARIA of
Ehrenberg (1875) or PERIPYLEA of Hertwig (1879), although both groups have
not quite the same extension. We exclude from the SPUMELLARIA the Spyridina
(united with them by Ehrenberg) and include the Collodaria. With the
Peripylea of Hertwig we unite his Thalassicollea and Sphærozoea. To avoid
any confusion it would perhaps be better to name this legion "Peripylaria."
The SPUMELLARIA agree with the ACANTHARIA in the structure of the simple
capsule-membrane, which is perforated by numerous small pores (but devoid
of the large main opening, which the NASSELLARIA and PHÆODARIA possess),
whence we unite both the former as Holotrypasta, both the latter as
Merotrypasta.
The difference between the two legions of Holotrypasta is determined by the
skeleton, which in the SPUMELLARIA is either siliceous or wanting, whilst
in the Acantharia it consists of the peculiar organic substance, acanthin.
The legion SPUMELLARIA is by far the largest and most important of the four
legions of Radiolaria, as well with respect to the number of different
forms, as to the enormous masses of individuals, which we encounter living
and fossil. We distinguish in this legion not less than thirty-two
different families, three hundred and sixteen genera, and more than
seventeen hundred species.
The classification of this large group requires for its better
comprehension a careful division into larger and smaller groups. We divide
it therefore first of all into two orders, #Collodaria# and #Sphærellaria#,
as proposed in the paper mentioned above.[3]
The #Collodaria# have no perfect latticed skeleton, and comprise two
suborders or sections: in the #Colloidea# the skeleton is entirely wanting,
in the #Beloidea# it is represented by a variable number of siliceous
needles or spicules, scattered in the calymma around the central capsule.
{7}The #Sphærellaria# differ from the #Collodaria# in the possession of a
perfect siliceous skeleton, which is originally a latticed spherical shell,
enveloping the central capsule. By modification of this fenestrated sphere
arises an enormous mass of different forms, which we dispose in
twenty-eight families, and these in four larger groups, suborders or
sections,--#Sphæroidea#, #Prunoidea#, #Discoidea#, and #Larcoidea#.
The #Sphæroidea#, the common ancestral group of the #Sphærellaria#, possess
a skeleton which is either a simple fenestrated sphere, or composed of two
or more concentric latticed spheres, which are united by radial beams; more
rarely it becomes more or less spongy.
The #Prunoidea# are derived from the #Sphæroidea# by prolongation of the
latticed sphere in one axis; the skeleton therefore becomes here
ellipsoidal or cylindrical (often with annular transversal constrictions).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account