Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
The secondary feet, which we contrast with the three primary feet as later
productions, exhibit great variations in number and development. Very
frequently three interradial secondary feet become developed, alternating
with the three primary cortinar or perradial feet, and opposed to them in
pairs (Pl. 95, figs. 7, 8). In these hexapodal #Spyroidea# (or Hexaspyrida)
an odd anterior or sternal foot (_z_) is opposite to the odd caudal foot,
and two paired posterior or tergal feet (_t'_, _t''_) to the two pectoral
feet. When the sternal foot becomes rudimentary or lost, pentapodal forms
arise (Pentaspyrida, Pl. 95, figs. 9-11), and when the two odd feet (caudal
and sternal) disappear, tetrapodal forms arise with two pairs of feet
(Therospyrida, Pl. 89, figs. 5, 6). The latter differ from {1021}those
quadrupedal forms in which two opposite sagittal feet (the caudal and
sternal) alternate in the form of a cross with two paired lateral or
pectoral feet (Tetraspyrida, Pl. 53, figs. 19, 20). In many #Spyroidea# the
number of basal feet is greatly increased, and they form a regular radial
corona around the basal plate, like a circle of tentacles (Polyspyrida, Pl.
87). In this latter case the feet are usually flat and lamellar, whilst in
the other groups they exhibit a very variable form, as is seen in Pls.
83-89.
The _Central Capsule_ of the #Spyroidea# has been accurately observed in
only a few genera, and requires a further exact examination regarding the
different modifications which occur in their different families. It is very
probable that these will agree with the well known modifications in the
corresponding groups of #Cyrtoidea#. The characteristic Monopylean
structure of the capsule (with porochora and podoconus) was first described
by Richard Hertwig in his _Ceratospyris acuminata_ (_loc. cit._, p. 72,
taf. vii. fig. 2). I found the same afterwards in many other forms. In the
Zygospyrida and Tholospyrida the central capsule seems to be usually
bilobate (bisected by the sagittal ring), and enclosed in the two chambers
of the cephalis. The two lobes of the capsule (right and left) are equal
and connected by a smaller middle part, which contains the transverse
elliptical nucleus and is enclosed by the sagittal ring; often each lobe
contains a large oil-globule. In some forms, however, three or four lobes
(sometimes perhaps more) are developed, which pierce the cortinar pores of
the basal plate and depend freely between the basal feet (Pl. 53, fig. 19).
In the Phormospyrida and Androspyrida the formation of such basal lobes
seems to be more frequent; they are here enclosed by the thorax. Usually
each lobe contains a large oil-globule. In _Nephrospyris_ (Pl. 90) and in
some similar genera the central capsule is violin-shaped, deeply bisected
by the sagittal ring; in each of the two lobes a series of oil-vesicles is
developed at both poles of the transverse axis (figs. 7, 10); the nucleus,
a transverse cylindrical body, is placed in the latter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account