Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
In the periphery of
the voluminous calymma of this singular genus a large number of globular
cells are developed (figs. 7, 10), probably symbiotic xanthellæ. In some
forms of _Nephrospyris_ these xanthellæ are enclosed by a peculiar inflated
girdle, developed in the periphery of the kidney-shaped skeleton (Pl. 90,
figs. 1, 4-6).
_Synopsis of the Families of_ #Spyroidea#.
{Cephalis without galea
Shell without thorax; no second { (or apical cupola), 1. ZYGOSPYRIDA.
shell-joint, developed from {
the base of the cephalis. {Cephalis with a galea
{ (or apical cupola), 2. THOLOSPYRIDA.
{Cephalis without galea
Shell with a thorax, or a { (or apical cupola), 3. PHORMOSPYRIDA.
second shell-joint, developed {
from the base of the cephalis.{Cephalis with a galea
{ (or apical cupola), 4. ANDROSPYRIDA.
{1022}Family LII. #ZYGOSPYRIDA#, n. fam. (Pls. 84-87).
_Definition._--#Spyroidea# without galea and thorax; the shell consisting
of the bilocular cephalis only and its apophyses.
The family Zygospyrida is by far the richest among the four families of
#Spyroidea#, the number of genera in the whole suborder amounting to
forty-five, in the former to twenty-eight; and the number of species in the
latter to two hundred and thirty-seven, in the former to one hundred and
seventy-two. The number of individuals also found in many species of
Zygospyrida is far greater than in any species of the three other families.
The shell of the Zygospyrida is represented by the bilocular cephalis only,
and never develops a galea (as in the Tholospyrida) nor a thorax (as in the
Phormospyrida and Androspyrida). The three latter families have therefore
been derived from the former as their common ancestral group.
The Zygospyrida are very similar and nearly related to the Monocyrtida, and
in both groups the cephalis alone represents the whole shell. Therefore in
1882, Bütschli, in the paper mentioned above (p. 1016), maintained the
opinion, that these two groups were identical. But there is this important
difference between them, that in the Zygospyrida (as in all #Spyroidea#)
the cephalis is bilocular, with a sagittal constriction, separating the
right and left chambers. In the Monocyrtida, however (as in all
#Cyrtoidea#), the cephalis is unilocular, forming a quite simple chamber
without sagittal constriction. Correspondingly the primary sagittal ring in
all Zygospyrida is well preserved and usually complete, while in the
Monocyrtida it is never complete, and often quite absent. Another
difference is indicated by the form of the central capsule, which in the
Zygospyrida is usually bilobed, and more developed in the frontal axis,
whilst in the Monocyrtida it is commonly ovate, and more developed in the
principal axis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account