Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
_Habitat._--Central Pacific, Station 271, depth 2425 fathoms.
6. _Nephrospyris paradoxa_, n. sp.
Shell kidney-shaped, one and one-third times as broad as long, six times as
broad as the inflated marginal girdle, and half as long as the sternal
incision. Ring with six pairs of apophyses. Above and below the large
naso-orbital holes lie ten pairs of larger meshes. All the meshes are
filled up by very delicate arachnoidal network.
_Dimensions._--Length of the shell 0.4 to 0.5, breadth 0.5 to 0.7; ring
0.06 to 0.08 long.
_Habitat._--Central Pacific, Station 270, depth 2925 fathoms.
{1103}----
Suborder II. Botryodea, Haeckel, 1881 (Pl. 96).
_Polycyrtida_, Haeckel, 1862, Monogr. d. Radiol., p. 341.
_Polycyrtida_, Bütschli, 1882, Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., vol. xxxvi. p.
519.
_Botryodea_ (= _Botrida_ vel _Botryida_), Haeckel, 1881, Prodromus, p.
439.
_Definition._--NASSELLARIA with a complete lattice-shell, exhibiting
constantly a lobate and multilocular cephalis, with three to five or more
separated lobes, and two to three or more constrictions.
The suborder #Botryodea# differs from the other #Cyrtellaria# in the
multilocular and lobate shape of the cephalis, which is composed of at
least three or four, often five or six, and sometimes even a greater number
of lobes, which are separated by constrictions and partly also by internal
septa. This characteristic shape is found neither in the #Spyroidea# (with
bilocular cephalis) nor in the #Cyrtoidea# (with simple cephalis). The
affinities of the former group to the two latter form a very complicated
problem, which is not yet solved; the morphology of the #Botryodea# is the
most difficult part in the system of NASSELLARIA, and what we can here
give, are incomplete and unsatisfactory beginnings only.
Up to the year 1860 only a single genus of the #Botryodea# was known,
_Lithobotrys_, one of the oldest genera of "_Polycystina_," and described
by Ehrenberg in 1844 (Monatsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. d. Wiss. Berlin, p.
74). He gave the following definition:--"Loricæ siliceæ articuli in adulto
non in seriem, sed in uvæ brevis formam, id est in loculos plus minus
discretos nonnullos contiguos dispositi. Proxime ad Lithocampem accedit."
In his first System (1847) _Lithobotrys_ is placed with _Lithocampe_ among
his family Lithochytrina. Afterwards (1860) Ehrenberg added two new genera,
under the names _Botryocampe_ and _Botryocyrtis_ and figured some species
of these incompletely in his last works (1872, 1875).
In my Monograph I founded for these three genera the separate subfamily of
Polycyrtida, added as a fourth genus _Spyridobotrys_, and gave to the group
the following definition (1862, loc. cit., p. 341):--"Lattice-shell divided
by two or more annular strictures, partly longitudinally, partly
transversely, into three or more unequal chambers, which are placed in
different planes and have a different relation to the poles of the
shell-axis."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account