Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
The new and remarkable forms of #Botryodea#, which I subsequently found in
the Challenger collection, demonstrated that the #Botryodea# differ from
the other #Cyrtellaria# (the #Cyrtoidea# as well as the #Spyroidea#) in a
far higher degree than I formerly had supposed. A synopsis of the figures
in Pl. 96 will give sufficient evidence of this view. Therefore in my
Prodromus (1881, p. 439) {1104}I completely separated the #Botryodea# (or
Botrida) from the other suborders of #Cyrtellaria# (Spyrida and Cyrtida).
Bütschli gave, in 1882, in his paper on the Cyrtida (_loc. cit._) a very
accurate description of _Lithobotrys geminata_, and pointed out its close
affinity to _Lithocorythium_ and _Lithomelissa_, and the importance of an
oblique septum separating the cephalis into a smaller anterior and a larger
posterior lobe. His views on the #Botryodea# (as a subordinate group of the
#Cyrtoidea#) are however incomplete, since the peculiar forms, described in
the following pages, were unknown to him.
According to the wide morphological divergence of the different
#Botryodea#, and the numerous peculiar forms developed from it, we here
divide the whole group into three families and ten genera, with fifty-five
species. These form, however, only a small part of the large and varied
mass of closely related forms which are found in the rich collections of
the Challenger. The great difficulty of researches on their intimate
structure, and the great amount of time required for it, prevented me from
giving a more complete and exact description than the one here given. The
observation of the small shells from all the different sides is a difficult
task, requiring years of work, and its satisfactory explanation would be
possible only by means of numerous figures.
The three families of #Botryodea#, here described, correspond to the three
first groups of #Cyrtoidea#. The first family, Cannobotryida, corresponds
to the Monocyrtida clausa and to the Zygospyrida; their shell consists of a
cephalis only, without subsequent joints. The second family, Lithobotryida,
corresponds to the Dicyrtida and Phormospyrida; their shell is composed of
a cephalis and a thorax, both joints being separated by a transverse
cortinar septum and a collar stricture. The third family, Pylobotryida, has
a three-jointed shell, like the Tricyrtida, with cephalis, thorax and
abdomen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account