Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
O. Bütschli, 1882, in his valuable paper entitled: "Beiträge zur Kentniss
der Radiolarien-Skelette, insbesondere der der Cyrtida" (Zeitschr. für
wiss. Zool., vol. xxxvi. p. 485) made an attempt at a natural
classification of the Cyrtida, which he derived from the #Spyroidea# or
Zygocyrtida. As already mentioned above, we cannot accept this essay as the
foundation of a true natural system, since the affinities of the
#Cyrtellaria# (and of the NASSELLARIA as a whole) are far more complicated
and difficult than Bütschli supposed. His views were supported by accurate
observations only on the structure of the fossil #Cyrtoidea# of Barbados;
these, however, represent the minority only of the genera, and many
interesting and important forms (mainly of true "Monocyrtida") remained
unknown to Bütschli. A great part, however, of his observations are very
useful, and his remarks on comparative morphology are very suggestive.
The #Cyrtoidea# may be divided into families and subfamilies according to
three different principles, viz., (1) the number of joints into which the
shell is divided by transverse strictures; (2) the number of radial
apophyses which arise from the shell; (3) the shape of the basal mouth,
which is either open or closed by a lattice-plate. At present every attempt
of classification in this large group must be more or less artificial,
since the affinities of the numerous smaller and larger groups are
extremely complicated, and the ontogeny, the only sure guide in this
phylogenetical labyrinth, is perfectly unknown. It seems therefore the most
convenient to employ for our artificial classification, first, the number
of shell-joints, second, the radial structure, and third, the shape of the
mouth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account