Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
1. Family Stephanida (= Monostephida, 1881, p. 447). Skeleton entirely
formed by one simple ring (the primary vertical sagittal ring). The only
"gate" is the simple aperture of the ring.
2. Family Semantida (= Dyostephida, 1881, p. 446). Skeleton composed of
two rings, perpendicular to one another; the primary vertical sagittal
ring bears at the base a horizontal basal ring; between the two rings two
or more "basal gates remain."
3. Family Coronida (= Triostephida, 1881, p. 445). Skeleton composed of
two crossed vertical or meridional rings, perpendicular to one
another--the primary sagittal ring and the secondary frontal ring.
Commonly the two vertical rings are united at the base by a horizontal
basal ring, and between them remain two or more "basal gates."
4. Family Tympanida (= Parastephida, 1881, p. 446). Skeleton composed of
two parallel horizontal rings, and upper mitral ring, and a lower basal
ring, both connected by vertical or divergent columellæ, which are parts
of vertical rings (primary sagittal, and secondary frontal ring).
The peculiar structure of the central capsule of the #Stephoidea#, and
their character as true MONOPYLEA, were first recognised by Richard
Hertwig, who in 1879, in his Organismus der Radiolarien, gave an excellent
detailed description of it (_loc. cit._, pp. 68-72, Taf. vii. figs. 4, 5).
He also pointed out the near affinity of these "Acanthodesmida" with the
#Spyroidea# or Zygocyrtida, uniting the latter with the former family.
A fuller explanation of this affinity, and of the morphological and
phylogenetic importance of the "Acanthodesmida," as ancestral forms of the
#Spyroidea# and #Cyrtoidea#, was given in 1882 by Bütschli (Zeitschr. f.
wiss. Zool., vol. xxxvi. pp. 495-501). He described in detail some
important fossil forms of Acanthodesmida as different species of
"_Stephanolithis_," a name which Ehrenberg had employed for various
ring-like fragments of Radiolarian shells, sponges, and other fossil
bodies. The four fossil species which Bütschli described represent four
different genera of #Stephoidea#, viz., _Semantis_ (_spinescens_),
_Semantrum_ (_mülleri_), _Semantidium_ (_haeckelii_), and _Tristephanium_
(_hertwigii_). On the phylogenetic conclusions, derived from these accurate
observations, compare above, p. 893, &c. The topographical signification of
the parts, employed by Bütschli, is contrary to mine; he calls my dorsal
side the "anterior," and my ventral side the "posterior."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account