Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
4. Polyphyletic hypothesis, deriving the different groups of NASSELLARIA
from different skeletonless Nassellida, by development of simple siliceous
skeletons in different ways. Among the numerous polyphyletic hypotheses
which are possible, one of the simplest would be the supposition that three
different fundamental forms of skeleton may have arisen independently one
from another: (1) a simple sagittal ring as original form of the
#Stephoidea# and #Spyroidea# (A); (2) a simple basal tripod as original
form of the #Plectoidea# (B); (3) a simple latticed cephalis as original
form of the #Botryodea# and #Cyrtoidea# (C). This triphyletic hypothesis is
supported by R. Hertwig (1879, _loc. cit._, p. 136); he assumes that the
original skeletonless Nassellida (_Cystidium_) have produced three
different branches, his "Acanthodesmida" (= #Stephoidea# and #Spyroidea#)
with a primary ring, his "Plagiacanthida" (= #Plectoidea#) with a primary
tripod, and his Cyrtida (= #Botryodea# and #Cyrtoidea#) with a primary
cephalis. This hypothesis seems rather probable on the first view; but it
meets with the greatest difficulties in view of the fact that these three
original elements of the skeleton are more or less evidently combined in
the great majority of NASSELLARIA. The greatest difficulty arises from the
fact that often among very similar and closely allied forms the first
exhibits all three elements (A, B, C) combined, whilst the second has a
combination of A and B, the third of B and C, the fourth of A and C; and
there are other forms, very similar to the former, in which one element
only is recognisable. Another difficulty arises from the fact that the
intimate structure of the cephalis in the majority of #Cyrtellaria# is not
perfectly known, and often exhibits structures which are difficult to
explain with regard to the three elements A, B, C. Under these
circumstances further researches on the numerous imperfectly known
NASSELLARIA are required, and chiefly accurate observations on their more
minute structure and on their important ontogeny.
{895}We divide the immense legion of NASSELLARIA into two large orders, the
#Plectellaria# without complete lattice-shell, and the #Cyrtellaria# with a
complete lattice-shell or a "cephalis," including the central capsule; the
latter, of course, have arisen from the former. The #Plectellaria# comprise
three different suborders, the #Nassoidea# (without skeleton), the
#Plectoidea# (with a tripodal skeleton, without ring), and the #Stephoidea#
(with a primary sagittal ring, with or without tripod). The #Cyrtellaria#
again also comprise three different suborders, the #Spyroidea# (with
bilocular cephalis and a sagittal constriction), the #Botryodea# (with
multilocular and lobate cephalis, exhibiting two or more constrictions and
three or more lobes), and the #Cyrtoidea# (with simple, unilocular
cephalis, without constriction).
_Synopsis of the Orders and Suborders of_ NASSELLARIA.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account