Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons used — John Shaqi
Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons usedBrowne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Science
Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons used
Browne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Medical jurisprudence -- Great Britain; Poisons; Trials (Murder) -- Great Britain; Trials (Poisoning) -- Great Britain
To _Perkins_, the inspector of the Eton police, Tawell was dangerously
communicative.
“On the day after I had taken him into custody,” said this witness,
“and brought him to my own house, after he had seen his lawyer, he
said to me, ‘The unfortunate woman once lived in my service, about two
years and a half, or nearly so.’ He asked me if I knew this. I told
him I had heard so. Then Holmes, the other constable, came in, and he
added, ‘She left my service about five years ago.’ I told him whatever
he said I should communicate to the coroner to-morrow. He said, ‘he
would have no objection to that,’ and then continued, ‘she had been in
the habit of writing letters to him for money,’ and that he had been
pestered with her; she was a very good servant when in his service,
but a bad principled woman. She wrote to him that if he did not send
her something she would make away with herself. He came down to her
house and told her that he would not give her any more money. She then
asked him if he would not give her some porter. I then sent for a
bottle of stout, and she had a glass and I had a glass. She then took
out a small phial, about the size of a thimble, and said, “I will,
I will,” and poured some into her glass and drank a part of it—the
remainder was thrown into the fire. She then done herself about and
laid down on the hearth-rug; I then went out. I did not think she was
in earnest, otherwise I would have called somebody.’ I asked him if he
had got those letters, and he said, ‘No, I never keep such letters as
those.’ I knew him by person, having seen him at Aylesbury.”
The _cross-examination_ was unimportant—mainly directed to the
probable inaccuracy of his recollection and to the nature of the
communication he made to the coroner. _Holmes_, in addition to
confirming _Perkins’_ report of the prisoner’s statement, was present
when Mrs. Tawell visited her husband, when, in reply to her question,
“what he had been doing,” he replied, “Nothing. I hope you will forgive
me.”
MEDICAL EVIDENCE.
_H. Montague Champneys_, surgeon at Salthill, sent for a few minutes
before 7 P.M. on January 1st, said—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account