Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons used — John Shaqi
Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons usedBrowne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Science
Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons used
Browne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Medical jurisprudence -- Great Britain; Poisons; Trials (Murder) -- Great Britain; Trials (Poisoning) -- Great Britain
“A portion of the contents of the stomach was then taken from
the bottle and put into a tubulated retort, to which was added a
very small quantity of dilute sulphuric acid; the retort with its
contents was placed on the sand bath, a receiver applied and a
portion distilled off. When about two drachms of clear liquid had
distilled over, it was removed from the receiver into a test glass,
about a grain of green sulphate of iron was added, and when this
was dissolved, a small quantity of solution of potassa. These were
allowed to remain a short time together and stirred with a glass rod.
Subsequently muriatic acid was added in sufficient quantity _when
instantly Prussian blue appeared_, which could not have resulted
unless cyanogen or hydrocyanic acid had been present. But it could not
be recognised by the smell. Although I had no doubt in my own mind,
from the gentle heat that had been employed in the above detailed
process of distillation, that the prussic acid could not have resulted
from any decomposition of the animal matters present in the contents
of the stomach, yet I thought it prudent to conduct the process of
distillation in such a manner as to preclude the possibility of such
occurrence.
“Another and much larger portion of the contents of the stomach was
put into another retort, to which a little dilute sulphuric acid
was added as before, and the retort with its contents placed in a
water bath, to which some common salt was added. The salt-water bath
was heated until it boiled; a receiver was put on to the retort, an
adapter intervening so as to remove the receiver to a greater distance
from the furnace, and the receiver was kept as cool as possible by
folds of blotting paper kept constantly wet applied to its external
surface. In this manner was the distillation slowly conducted, until
about an ounce of clear liquid had distilled over.”
On the removal of this liquid from the receiver it had the same smell
as that contained in the bottle had before distillation, and neither
myself, Mr. Norblad, Mr. Champneys, nor my son could detect the smell
of prussic acid in the slightest degree. In fact the odour of beer and
digesting food was so powerful as to cover or disguise the smell of
the prussic acid in this weak state, but on applying the same tests as
before Prussian blue was found in considerable quantity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account