Repton and its neighbourhood : $b a descriptive guide of the archæology, &c. of the districtHipkins, F. C. (Frederick Charles)
History
Repton and its neighbourhood : $b a descriptive guide of the archæology, &c. of the district
Hipkins, F. C. (Frederick Charles)
Repton (England) -- Description and travel; Repton (England) -- History
The number of Schoolmasters varied—in Watson’s time two, in Whitehead’s
three, Schoolmaster, Middle Master, and Usher. The number of boys also
varied from 60 to 200, with “7 or 8 poor schollers.” Among the boys
mentioned were four sons of Philip, first Earl of Chesterfield, Philip,
Charles, George and Ferdinando Stanhope; Michael Folliott, son of Henry
Folyot, Foleott or Ffoliott, Baron of Ballyshannon, Ireland; Wingfield,
Thomas, Vere Essex, and Oliver Cromwell, the four sons of Thomas
Cromwell, first Earl of Ardglass, besides the sons of divers knights and
gentlemen, Sir Francis Burdett, Bart., Sir Samuel Sleigh, Knt., Godfrey
Meynell, Thomas Sanders, William Bullock, &c., &c., most of whom had gone
to the Universities of Oxford or Cambridge. (See _Repton School Register_)
The “Court yard” (School yard) had been used by the boys to recreate
themselves in, without let or hindrance from the defendant’s ancestors.
The award was well known, and agreed to at the time, 1653, but the
defendant had refused to comply with it, and had stopped several ways,
and blocked up a door leading to the brook, from the north-east corner of
the Schoolmaster’s garden.
The evidence of Ann Heyne, &c., referred to above, proved that the
defendant’s conduct had “caused many brawls, and many schollers to be
affrighted and absent themselves from schoole.” The value of the land was
worth from 2d. to 6d. per annum!
The defendant’s witnesses agreed about most of the points in dispute, but
they said the boys had no right to play in the great court yard without
permission, and some of them remembered having been whipped by Godfrey
Thacker and Schoolemaster Watson for so doing, and others remember
playing in “the Staineyard,” by orders of the Schoolemasters Watson and
Whitehead. Defendant also objected to the disposal of ashes, which the
Headmaster used to have placed on a mound opposite his front door, and
the Usher at the back of the Causey (_i.e._ the way between the stone
walls, leading into the old big school) instead of in the garden at the
back of the School, as they used to be put, as one witness said “he had
seen them carried by Mr. Schoolemaster Watson’s daughter!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account