Up to the present time, the general character of the habitat, together with the gross appearance of the plant itself, has been thought sufficient to determine the proper position of a plant or a formation in the water-content classification. Such a method is adequate, however, only for plants and formations which bear a distinct impress. For an accurate classification into the three categories, hydrophytes, mesophytes, and xerophytes, it is necessary to make exact determinations of the normal holard and chresard of the habitat, and to supplement this, in some degree at least, by histological studies. Except in the case of saline, acid, and frozen soils, the holard alone will be a fairly accurate index, especially in habitats of similar soil composition. For an exact and comprehensive classification, however, and particularly in comparative work, the chresard must constitute the sole criterion. As the latter has been ascertained for very few formations, and in Nebraska and Colorado alone, the present characterization of many plants and formations as hydrophytic, mesophytic, or xerophytic must be regarded as largely tentative, and the final classification will be possible only after the thorough quantitative investigation of their habitats. The water-content groups, hydrophytia, mesophytia, and xerophytia, include all formations found upon the globe. The exactness with which this classification applies to vegetation is made somewhat more evident by dividing mesophytia into forest and grassland. This is based primarily upon light association, but it also reflects water-content differences in a large degree. The groups thus constituted represent the fundamental zonation of the vegetative covering with respect to water-content. Ocean, forest, grassland, and desert correspond exactly to hydrophytia, hylophytia, poophytia, and xerophytia. The difference is merely one of terminology: the first series takes into account the physiognomy of the vegetation itself, while the other emphasizes the causative factors. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORMATION =259.= A strict account of development should trace the results of the various activities of vegetation in their proper sequence. This is aggregation, migration, ecesis, reaction, and competition. These functions are so intimately and often so inextricably associated that it is hardly feasible to discuss development by treating each one separately. In consequence, the two fundamental phenomena, invasion and succession, which they produce, are taken as the basis of the discussion. These, moreover, are different only in degree; succession is merely complete, periodic invasion. Nevertheless, the subject gains in clearness by a separate treatment of each. INVASION