In the light of all this, how many human souls could be guiltily cast
out as bad? It requires infinite pains and almost infinite knowledge to
judge one’s physical condition. A man is suffering from some ailment and
a doctor is called to treat him. The disease may be of long standing and
located in some organ beyond the reach of sight and hearing; he patiently
watches every symptom to know the real condition of the physical man and
the cause that made him ill. He calls the wisest surgeons to consult and
these may never be able to locate the disease, or the cause that made the
patient as he is. But twelve untutored jurors and a judge wantonly and
carelessly set themselves up to pass on the condition of a human soul—a
soul no man has seen or by any chance can ever see,—a life they do not
know and could not understand and do not even seek to understand. They
take this soul and, with their poor light, which at the best is blackest
darkness, they pronounce it bad, and in violence and malice deny it the
right of fellowship with its human brothers, each equally a portion of
the great Infinite which takes all of good and all of bad and makes of
these one great, divine, inclusive whole.
The judge must and does view the conduct of his victim according to
his own ideas of right and wrong. At his best he takes with him to the
judgment tribunal every prejudice, bias and belief that his education,
surroundings and heredity have left on him. He measures the condemned
by the ideal man, and the ideal man must be himself, or one made from
his weak, fallible concepts of right and wrong. Naturally he places
little weight or value upon those vices which are a portion of his own
character, or those virtues which he does not possess, or especially
admire. A judge can see no character or virtue in an accused man, who
would rather suffer imprisonment or death than to betray his fellows.
In the judgment of the courts the betrayer is rewarded, the man of
character and worth condemned. A judge reads the code, “Thou shalt not
steal.” He cannot understand how a so-called thief should have forcibly
taken a paltry sum. He cannot conceive that he, himself, could under any
circumstances have done the like. Such conduct must come from a depraved
and wicked heart—a devil that dwells within the culprit. The common
thief looks at the judge arrayed in fine linen and living in luxury and
ease, with nothing to do but pass judgment on his fellowman. He dimly
understands how much easier it is for the judge to obtain his large
salary than for him to get the poor wages of his hazardous and shifting
trade. But the judge does not begin to comprehend that, if he could
not have received his salary or obtained a tolerable life in any of the
endless grades of activity between his profession and the thief’s, very
easily he might have been the victim with some other fortunate man to
pronounce him bad. Human judgments are not passed in view of all the
circumstances of the case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account