Response in the Living and Non-LivingBose, Jagadis Chandra
Science
Response in the Living and Non-Living
Bose, Jagadis Chandra
Electrophysiology; Fatigue; Irritability
[Illustration: FIG. 15.--RESPONSE IN PLANT (FROM THE STIMULATED A TO
UNSTIMULATED B) COMPLETELY IMMERSED UNDER WATER
The leaf-stalk is clamped securely in the middle with the cork C, inside
the tube T, which is filled with water, the plant being completely
immersed. Moistened threads in connection with the two
non-polarisable electrodes are led to the side tubes _t t'_. One end
of the stalk is held in ebonite forceps and vibrated. A current of
response is found to flow in the stalk from the excited A to the
unexcited B, and outside, through the liquid, from B to A. A portion
of this current, flowing through the side tubes _t t'_, produces
deflection in the galvanometer.]
#Plant response a physiological or vital response.#--I now proceed to a
demonstration of the fact that whatever be the mechanism by which they
are brought about, these plant responses are physiological in their
character. As the investigations described in the next few chapters will
show, they furnish an accurate index of physiological activity. For it
will be found that, other things being equal, whatever tends to exalt or
depress the vitality of the plant tends also to increase or diminish its
electric response. These E.M. effects are well marked, and attain
considerable value, rising sometimes, as has been said before, to as
much as .1 volt or more. They are proportional to the intensity of
stimulus.
It need hardly be added that special precautions are taken to avoid
shifting of contacts. Variation of contact, however, could not in any
case account for repeated transient responses to repeated stimuli, when
contact is made on iso-electric surfaces. Nor could it in any way
explain the reversible nature of these responses, when A and B are
stimulated alternately. These responses are obtained in the plants even
when completely immersed in water, as in the experimental arrangement
(fig. 15). It will be seen that in this case, where there could be no
possibility of shifting of contact, or variation of surface, there is
still the usual current of response.
I shall describe here a few crucial experiments only, in proof of the
physiological character of electric response. The test applied by
physiologists, in order to discriminate as to the physiological nature
of response, consists in finding out whether the response is diminished
or abolished by the action of anaesthetics, poisons, and excessively high
temperature, which are known to depress or destroy vitality.
I shall therefore apply these same tests to plant responses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account