Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
The evidence that the story of the hasty execution of Hastings is false
does not rest solely on Stallworthe's letter. Morton and Fabyan are
convicted out of their own mouths.
{215}
This is a point which should be clearly understood. It must be borne
in mind that we have certain fixed dates. Hastings was certainly
arrested on June 13. It is also certain that Thursday, June 26, was
the date of Richard's accession: it is fixed by the year book. Dr.
Shaw's sermon was preached on the previous Sunday, that is June 22.
Fabyan, as well as Stallworthe, tells us that the execution of Hastings
took place on the previous Friday. These are fixed beacons, and will
lead us to the truth. They will also enable us to detect the false
lights thrown out by Morton and Fabyan. They both knew the truth well,
but they had to manipulate the dates so as to make it appear that
Hastings was executed on the 13th. It must be borne in mind that, on
Fabyan's own showing, the execution took place on the Friday before
Shaw's sermon was preached.
In order to give a plausible appearance to the assertion that Hastings
was beheaded on the 13th, Fabyan tried to get rid of the week between
the 13th and the 20th. He thought he was bound to recognise the fact
that the execution was on the Friday before Shaw's sermon, so he
brought the sermon back a week too. But Shaw's sermon was well known
to have been preached on the Sunday before the accession. So he had to
move back the accession also, and he placed it on June 20. Here
Fabyan's dishonesty is detected, for the 20th was not a Thursday, and
that the 26th was the date of the accession is beyond dispute.
Morton was, of course, in the same difficulty as regards his dates.
But he was far better practised in the manipulation of evidence. Such
an old hand would commit himself to dates as little as possible. {216}
He would fear them as a thief fears a detective. He gives only one,
and he selects the right day of the week, which Fabyan did not. But
this is quite enough to convict him. He chose the 19th for the day of
Richard's accession with the very same object as Fabyan, to get rid of
the gap between the 13th and the 20th; well knowing that the right date
for the accession was the 26th.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account