Lepsius’ letter to Rosellini gives a critical recapitulation of the
discoveries of the Master. It is the first really methodical and
scientific work of an adherent of the Champollionic system, and although
after this Lepsius only returned incidentally to the linguistic and
grammatical side of Egyptology,[27] yet in this work, as everywhere
where he planted the lever, he has pointed out the right way and method.
In the Nubian Grammar, which was one of the chief works of his life,
and which was completed at a late date, he showed how firmly he stood
upon the grammatical foundation so early won, and how faithful he
remained thenceforth to grammatical studies. He did not cease, too, to
work at those studies, regarding the sounds of languages and the
alphabet, to which he had early devoted himself. His “Standard
Alphabet,”[28] which originated long afterwards and amidst great
opposition, was intended chiefly to enable missionaries and travellers
to reproduce correctly in our own language the sounds of the foreign
tongues examined by them. This was to be done by means of letters,
easily and conveniently modified by dashes and dots. It became of great
practical importance, as it was adopted by the English “Church
Missionary Society” as the most available universal alphabet to be
employed, according to their directions, by their emissaries. No one can
deny that it is also of scientific value. Its applicability has been
specially proved with the African languages, and in this department it
has been most successfully employed in a great number of grammatical and
lexicographical works, as well as biblical translations and the
reproduction of narrations, legends, and proverbs in the various idioms.
Of the Hamitic branch of the African languages, which is distinguished
by grammatical genders, there are seven side-branches, from the ancient
Egyptian to the _Haūsa-_ and _Nama-_ (_Namaqua-_) languages, which have
been thus examined. Of the more remote native African idioms there are
not less than twenty-two. In 1874, during the Congress of Orientalists
at London, we ourselves were permitted to hold council with him and
other leaders of science, concerning an acceptable universal method of
transcription for hieroglyphic writing. Many of his propositions were
adopted at that time, but the method of transcription agreed on in the
British Museum did not become current, and it is undoubtedly in need of
much improvement.
Lepsius had already given particular attention to the two special
departments in which he was to achieve the greatest and most fruitful
results; first at Göttingen, under the superintendence of O. Müller,
then in Paris after the publication of Biot’s work, and finally at Rome,
in the company of Bunsen. These departments were first, history, with
its numerical groundwork of chronology, and in the second place,
mythology.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account