Great Britain -- History -- Richard I, 1189-1199; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard I, King of England, 1157-1199
of the time all record the massacre without a word or a hint of
reprobation; one at least who was himself in the host openly rejoices
over it as a just vengeance for the Crusaders slain during the siege
by the crossbows of the garrison.[741] With the leaders every other
consideration would probably be outweighed by a military one. Until
these prisoners were disposed of in some safe way, the Crusade must
be at a standstill. They could not be left in Acre or anywhere else
without a guard far more numerous than it was possible to spare from
the main enterprise. Saladin’s conduct had extinguished the hope
of disposing of them by exchange. The only sure way was to follow
an example set by him, though on a much smaller scale, four years
before, when he put to death all the Templars and Hospitaliers who
had been captured in the battle of Hattin.[742] So the deed was done;
and that same night a herald proclaimed throughout the host that on
the morrow all must be ready to set out for Ascalon.[743]
CHAPTER IV
FROM ACRE TO JOPPA
1191
Lignum Crucis, Signum Ducis,
Sequitur exercitus,
Quod non cessit, sed praecessit
In vi Sancti Spiritus.
_Berter of Orleans._
Two main roads led southward from Acre. One crossed the river Kishon
at a point which on the map is about half way between Nazareth and
the sea, passed over the middle of Mount Carmel, and then along
the eastern side of the plain which lies between the coast and the
mountain-range of Samaria and Judea. Cross-paths through the defiles
of this range led from the road to the Holy Places of southern
Palestine—Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron—and connected it with the
great lines of communication running through these places southward
to Egypt and Mecca and northward up the Jordan valley to Damascus;
paths across the plain connected it with the other great main road,
which followed the coast-line all the way to the mouth of the Nile.
The inland route was the more direct way to Jerusalem; but for the
Crusaders the coast route was the safer, indeed the only safe one.
The re-conquest of the land must begin with the re-conquest of the
seaboard towns. Acre might serve as principal base for the whole
expedition; but this was not enough; before the Crusaders could
venture into the interior of the land they must make sure of being
able to communicate with Cyprus and with Europe through other ports
besides Acre, and with Acre itself by sea as well as by land. They
must also endeavour to block at least one of the enemy’s lines
of communication with Egypt; and of these the most frequented and
important was the coast route, to which the entrance from Egypt, both
by land and sea, was commanded by the great fortress of Ascalon. Thus
the plan of campaign implied in the order issued on the night of
August 20 was to regain, first and foremost, the whole seaboard of
the Holy Land.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account