Great Britain -- History -- Richard I, 1189-1199; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard I, King of England, 1157-1199
A march of ten miles brought the host to Beit Nuba, on a level space
of high ground close to the northern end of the natural fosse which
lies between the Shephelah and the mountain range. The hearts of
the pilgrims “were glad with the hope that they were going to the
Sepulchre”; but “their bodies were ill at ease,” for the Syrian
winter was now at its worst, and in their present exposed encampment
there was no shelter from its ravages. Stormy wind and tempest,
torrential rain and hail, beat down or tore up the tents; armour
rusted, clothes rotted, biscuits and bacon were so soaked that they
became putrid; horses died, men sickened; and in less than a week
“the wise Templars, the brave Hospitaliers, and the men of the land”
came to the conclusion that under the existing circumstances an
attempt to besiege Jerusalem could lead to nothing but disaster.
They told Richard that if the city were invested its besiegers would
be between two fires, Saladin breaking forth upon them from within
and the “outside” Turkish army cutting them off from communication
with the coast and depriving them of supplies.[842] The men who
spoke thus knew well that it was vain to dream of existing by
foraging on the barren, rocky tableland which forms the summit of
the Judean mountain-range, and that the host, if it got there at
all, would probably starve long before the defenders of the city,
which Saladin was sure to have victualled for a siege, and which
it would hardly be possible to blockade so completely as to cut it
off from all means of obtaining further provisions. Nor was this
all. Supposing—these counsellors urged—that the city were taken,
its capture would be useless unless it could be at once filled with
troops capable of holding it permanently; and this would be no
easy matter, for the western pilgrims, who formed the bulk of the
host, would return to their home-lands as soon as their pilgrimage
was accomplished, and thus when they were gone all that had been
won would be lost again.[843] Hereupon the western leaders called
a council of war at Natroun;[844] they may have retired there on
purpose to be well away from the rest of the army while discussing
the matter. However this may be, they asked “the wise folk who were
born in the land” what course they would recommend under existing
circumstances. The Templars and Hospitaliers [Sidenote: _Jan. 6-13_]
at once answered that what they would advise was not to proceed
towards Jerusalem at present, but to re-fortify and occupy Ascalon,
so as to obtain some control over the transit of provisions from
the great Saracen storehouse, Cairo, to the Holy City.[845] An
Arab historian gives, very likely from the report of some spy who
overheard the proceedings of the council, a curious account of the
way in which the final decision was reached. Richard, he says, asked
to see a plan of Jerusalem, that he might judge for himself of the
force of the arguments put forward by the Knights. They drew a plan
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account