Great Britain -- History -- Richard I, 1189-1199; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard I, King of England, 1157-1199
for him; and when he thoroughly understood the character of the site
and surroundings of the city, he pronounced them such as to make
the city, in his opinion, virtually impregnable “so long”—thus the
Arab reports the words of the western king—“as Saladin lives and the
Moslems are united.”[846] Before the middle of January the host was
back at Ramlah.[847]
Whether Richard’s verdict on the prospects of the Crusade was really
quite so pessimistic as Ibn Alathyr represents may be doubted. The
scheme now proposed by the Military Orders and accepted by the
king was simply a reversion to the original plan of campaign with
which they had all set out from Acre, and from which Saladin’s
seeming panic after Arsuf had tempted them to diverge; and there
can be little doubt that the divergence was unwise. The Frank
pilgrim-chroniclers, sharing and voicing the disappointment of the
rank and file, declare indeed that the retirement from Beit Nuba
was a blunder, and that if their leaders had but known the evil
plight—due, like their own, to the weather—of Saladin and his men
at Jerusalem, the city might, “without doubt,” have been taken
easily.[848] But those who spoke thus could have no real knowledge as
to the state of affairs in Jerusalem, and their version of it finds
no countenance in the pages of Bohadin, who was there, and who may
fairly be trusted on the subject, since he makes no mystery about
the Sultan’s perils and alarms on other occasions. The picture drawn
by the very same Frankish chroniclers of the condition in which the
host, “doleful and down-hearted,” marched back to Ramlah shows that
it was quite unfit to attempt an invasion of the hill-country. Men
and beasts were alike worn out with weakness and fever, caused by
the wet and cold, and many of the “lesser folk,” sick and helpless,
would have been left behind but for King Richard, who caused them
to be sought out and brought away in safety.[849] Among the French
Crusaders discontent took the form of wholesale desertion. Some
went to Joppa; of these, some stayed there, and others sailed back
to Acre, “where living was not dear,” sarcastically observes the
Norman poet; some joined the marquis at Tyre, whither he had long
been trying to entice them; the duke of Burgundy himself went off
in dudgeon with his followers to Casal of the Plains. Extremely
angry, but nothing daunted, Richard and the faithful remnant of the
host set out on January 19 by a road which, crossing the plain from
Ramlah, brought them back at Ibelin[850] to the main road along the
coast. The ten miles’ march through mud and mire to Ibelin was a
sufficiently [Sidenote: _Jan. 20_] hard day’s work; but “that day was
nothing compared to the next,” when nearly double that distance had
to be covered, on a road where men and horses were constantly sinking
into swamps, and beneath a ceaseless downpour of rain, hail and snow;
and when at length they arrived before Ascalon, they could only make
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account