Great Britain -- History -- Richard I, 1189-1199; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard I, King of England, 1157-1199
The execution of this project required the consent of two persons:
Richard and the King of France. Richard’s consent proved harder
to win than Henry seems to have expected. There was a fundamental
though unexpressed difference between the views taken by the father
and the son of the place actually held by the son in Aquitaine.
Henry’s intention apparently had been from the outset, and was still,
that Aquitaine should during his own lifetime be governed by his
son—whether Richard or John—as his representative, and after his
death should become an underfief of the Angevin dominion—as Britanny
already was—in the hands of that same son and his heirs. Unluckily
he had allowed one part of this intention to be obscured, and in
practice well-nigh defeated, by his anxiety to secure the fulfilment
of the other part. From Henry’s point of view, Richard in 1183 was
simply his homager for the county of Poitou, his lieutenant over the
rest of the duchy, heir to the whole of it when he himself should
die, and, after young Henry’s death, heir also to the headship of
the royal house of England, Normandy and Anjou. But Richard could,
and did in effect, claim to be already duke of Aquitaine in his own
right, by virtue of his homage to France and his investiture at
Limoges. Moreover, Eleanor’s duchy held a different place in the
estimation of her son—the son who from his infancy had been her
recognized heir—from that which it held in the estimation of her
husband. Henry looked upon it as a mere appendage to his ancestral
territories; Richard looked upon it as his own especial possession,
and a possession which ought to rank in the future, as it always
had ranked in the past, on a footing of equality with them. The
same feeling which made Henry shrink from reducing the heritage of
Geoffrey Plantagenet or that of Maud of Normandy to the position of
an underfief would make Richard shrink from contemplating a like
alteration in the status of the heritage of his mother. The tragedy
of the last summer and the sudden change in his own prospects had so
far chastened his impetuous temper that he did not at once refuse his
father’s demand, but asked for two or three days delay that he might
consult with friends before giving a reply. Then he withdrew from the
court; at nightfall he mounted his horse, and rode southward with all
speed, sending word to his father that “he would never grant Poitou
to be held by anyone but himself.”[218]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account