Right and wrong in MassachusettsChapman, Maria Weston
History
Right and wrong in Massachusetts
Chapman, Maria Weston
Antislavery movements -- Massachusetts -- Boston; Massachusetts Anti-slavery Society
The Massachusetts brethren turned to their homes in sorrow and surprise
at the determination they had been unable to move. Only one course
remained for the preservation of their Society. Its injury, if not its
destruction, would be the necessary consequence of hesitating to adopt
it, and they announced their intention of public remonstrance against
the conduct of the Ex. Committee, and a reference of the whole case to
their common constituents--the abolitionists of Massachusetts. Grief,
they must, at all events, have felt: but _astonishment_ at the result
of their conference would have been spared, had they been informed that
it was, on one side, but a mere form, the whole affair having been
decided, a week previous, by the issue of a circular, of which the
following is an extract, signed by Messrs. Stanton, Tappan, Leavitt,
Birney, and the most prominent of the New York Board.
“The amount which the Massachusetts Board had “guaranteed” to pay
to this Society by the first of February just passed, was $7,500.
Of that sum, but $3,920 have been received, leaving $3,680 due to
this Society. From recent consultations had with the Massachusetts
Board, we are fully authorized in saying, that the Board will not
be able to pay this sum, much less the additional sum of $2,500
to fall due on the first of May next; nor do we believe it will
be received from the abolitionists of Massachusetts, _unless the
Executive Committee of the American Society send their own agents
into the field to raise it_. To the adoption of this latter course
they feel impelled by a sense of the duties they owe the slave.
They feel constrained to abandon this “arrangement” for the
following, among other reasons:
1. It works badly for this Society. Much the greater part of
the $3,920 received from Massachusetts, has been raised at the
expense of this Society, as the following statement shows. It was
collected as follows:
(1.) By individuals and societies, and
sent directly to the Treasury of this Society,
and, in the collection of which, the
Massachusetts Society took no part, $471 12
(2.) By the “Cent-a-week” Societies,
through the labors of N. Southard, who
is employed and paid by the American
Society, 271 05
(3.) By the direct labors of Messrs.
O. Scott, Ichabod Codding, and H. B.
Stanton, who was employed and paid by
the American Society, 812 42
(4.) By Isaac Winslow and H. B.
Stanton, at New Bedford, for circulating
Thome and Kimball’s journal, 750 00
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account