So the diary tells its own story: the story of the troublous official
life of the Council Chamber and of Wentworth’s Irish Parliaments; the
story of Wentworth’s sharp pursuit of the Earl’s titles to his Irish
lands; and the story of the private life in the Earl’s Dublin house,
with its social duties and family anxieties. Wentworth had married his
third wife privately, in England, a year after the death of his second
wife, and not long before his departure for Ireland. She had been sent
over to Dublin six months before him, to live rather mysteriously in
Dublin Castle, under her own unmarried name—as “Mistress Rhodes.” But
immediately on Wentworth’s arrival, her identity was revealed: the Lords
Justices were duly presented to the Lord Deputy’s lady, and permitted to
salute her with a kiss. And the diary records kind visits, and return
visits, between the Castle and the Earl of Cork’s Dublin town house;
little card-parties at the Castle, when the Chancellor and the Treasurer
both lost sums of money to the Lord Deputy; games of “Mawe,”[30] also
for money, and private theatricals acted by the Lord Deputy’s gentlemen.
The old Earl sat through a tragedy, on one occasion, which he found
“tragicall” indeed, because there was no time to have any supper. And
then, but six months after Wentworth’s arrival, there came the first hint
of the trouble about Lady Cork’s black marble tomb in St Patrick’s.
Mr. Bagwell has pointed out[31] how, to the old Elizabethan, whose
“Protestantism was not of the Laudian type,” there was nothing amiss in
the fact of a Communion-table standing detached in the middle of the
Church. The Earl, in erecting his monument, had indeed improved the
Chancel of St. Patrick’s, which had been earthen-floored, and often
in wet weather “overflown.” He had raised it, with three stone steps
and a pavement of hewn stones, “whereon,” the Earl wrote to Laud, “the
communion-table now stands very dry and gracefully.” Laud himself had
found it hard to interfere, in the face of general opinion supported by
two Archbishops.[32] But Wentworth was obdurate, and the King himself was
appealed to. It was considered a scandal that the Cork tomb should remain
“sett in the place where the high altar anciently stood.”[33] In the end,
the great black marble monument was taken down, stone by stone; and in
March 1635 Wentworth was able to write to Laud: “The Earl of Cork’s tomb
is now quite removed. How he means to dispose of it I know not; but up
it is put in boxes, as if it were marchpanes or banqueting stuffs, going
down to the christening of my young master in the country.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account