Robert Fulton and the SubmarineParsons, William Barclay
History
Robert Fulton and the Submarine
Parsons, William Barclay
Fulton, Robert, 1765-1815; Submarines (Ships)
The other mechanism in the interior of the boat is simple and
self-explanatory. There were two anchors with windlasses, one anchor to
hold in the usual manner against drifting, the other to regulate depth
when lying stationary. There were pumps for emptying the water ballast
chambers. On deck was a conning tower quite similar to the tower on a
modern submarine, which served when closed as a lookout for the
helmsman, and when open as means of ingress and egress for the crew.
This conning tower had glass windows through which an observer could
watch big prey, or steer his course when the boat was partially
submerged. Plate Fifth shows how the conning tower could be used when it
should be the only part of the vessel above the surface. This particular
plate is of peculiar interest in that Fulton has drawn a picture of
himself looking through the glass-covered ports. In the original drawing
the head is full size.
Attached to the conning tower were two pipes marked _F_ and _G_ in Plate
Second. These pipes led to the interior of the boat and permitted fresh
air to be drawn in, and the vitiated or mephitic air (as Fulton called
it) expelled. These pipes permitted the boat to be submerged so that the
deck was just awash, the only part above the surface being the upper
half of the conning tower and the air pipes. This is the situation as
shown in Plate Fifth. So operated, the boat did not differ materially
from a modern submarine under similar conditions with her periscope out
of water.
From Fulton’s small conning tower he had only direct vision. A periscope
enables the boat to be wholly submerged with vision obtained by
reflecting mirrors. But a boat submerged so as to be just awash, with
only the conning tower showing, and driven by a hand-operated propeller
could have entered at night unseen almost any harbor, because in those
days there were no powerful searchlights to illuminate the surface of
the water at a distance.
The British were right in the secret note that they sent to the naval
commanders that Fulton’s boat, even without the later improvements that
he showed the British Government, could in the hands of the French have
made an attack with very serious results upon an open roadstead such as
the mouth of the Thames.
According to modern phraseology, Fulton’s British boat was a submersible
rather than a submarine. The latter term defines a vessel that has
powers of offense under water by torpedoes that in turn have means of
locomotion. With such a torpedo neither Fulton nor the art was
acquainted. His torpedoes or “bombs” were immobile affairs intended to
be anchored, dragged by a boat or allowed to drift with the tide and to
explode by concussion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account