Robert Fulton and the SubmarineParsons, William Barclay
History
Robert Fulton and the Submarine
Parsons, William Barclay
Fulton, Robert, 1765-1815; Submarines (Ships)
With the Nautilus it is true that he contemplated dragging a “bomb”
beneath the bottom of a ship to be attacked, and in this respect the
Nautilus possessed some feature of a true submarine. The plan that he
proposed for the Nautilus presented many serious difficulties depending
as it did on the fixing of a spike in the bottom of the other vessel.
Fulton himself apparently reached the conclusion that this suggestion
was impracticable, through actual experiments or further study. The boat
that he proposed for the British Government had no such attachment, but
instead was designed to carry “bombs” to be deposited secretly in an
enemy harbor, and there to be anchored so as to remain beneath the
surface when they would come in contact with the bottoms of passing
vessels, or to be released in couples held by bridles and thus to be
carried by tidal currents across the cables of anchored ships when the
“bombs” would be drawn beneath the vessel and explode.
What Fulton called “bombs” are today known as mines. No means are shown
in his plans by which these mines could be placed or released while his
boat was submerged. The capability to submerge and to move beneath the
surface was expected to permit the boat to work into a harbor
unperceived, and there to lie in wait beneath the surface until night
presented the opportunity to rise unseen, when the mines would be placed
or set free. The successful experiment with the Dorothea showed that his
mines could be completely effective and that, therefore, his submersible
mine layer, as perhaps she can be correctly described, could have been
developed into a very effective engine of war.
In Fulton’s bombs, as he calls them, we are not particularly interested
because he has fully described these devices in his book that he wrote
on Torpedo Warfare. It is, however, in view of subsequent events
exceedingly interesting to point out that Fulton foresaw the conditions
that actually obtained in the recent war.
On pages 71–2 of the “Descriptions” he explained how hundreds of such
bombs or mines could be strewn in the channel of the Thames or along the
coast and it would not be in the power of the whole British marine to
prevent such practice. This is precisely what the Germans undertook to
do, forcing the British, even though they had control of the open seas,
to sweep the Channel by daylight, day after day, in order to remove
mines that might have been planted during the night. Furthermore, Fulton
pointed out that a line of such mines could be strung from Calais to
Dover, rendering it “impossible for any vessel to pass without certain
destruction.” When the German submarine attack on British commerce
became seriously acute, the British authorities put into execution that
which Fulton had suggested and strung a line of obstructions across the
Channel from Dover to Calais thereby compelling the German submarines to
pass around the northern coast of Scotland in order to reach the open
sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account