Robert Fulton and the SubmarineParsons, William Barclay
History
Robert Fulton and the Submarine
Parsons, William Barclay
Fulton, Robert, 1765-1815; Submarines (Ships)
The above books seem to have won popular approval because they appear in
several editions. Bishop Wilkins died in 1672 after a life full of
strenuosity, variety and action.
It is with his scientific publication standing fifth in the above list
that we are specially interested. This little book, which treats of a
great number of mechanical devices and principles such as wheels,
pulleys, screws, engines of war, clocks and other similar machines,
contains two chapters, one entitled, “Concerning the Art of Flying. The
several ways whereby this hath been, or may be attempted”; and the
other, “Concerning the Possibility of framing an Ark for Submarine
Navigation. The Difficulties and Conveniences of such a Contrivance.”
The latter chapter is the one that bears on our present discussion.
Although Wilkins gives credit to Mercennus, who as he puts it, “doth so
largely and pleasantly descant upon the making of a ship wherein men may
safely swim under the Water,” nevertheless he follows the line of
thought of Bourne without giving him credit. He closely imitated
Bourne’s scheme of leather attachments. He suggested leather bags open
at both ends, one end being without and the other within the ship, the
ends capable of being closed like those of a purse. These bags he would
use as means of ingress and egress for men and materials. Motion he
proposed to obtain by means of oars whose blades would be collapsible on
the back stroke, the oars projecting through the ship’s sides, the holes
being closed with leather attached to the oars and vessel. Wilkins had
in mind the use of such a vessel in attack against a “Navy of Enemies,
who by this means may be undermined in the water and blown up.”
The submersible power Wilkins would obtain by having his boat or “Ark”
ballasted so as to be of “equal weight with the like magnitude of
water,” that is, to be at the critical point between floating and
sinking, obviously one of greatest danger. He fancied that he could then
obtain vertical motion or plunging by attaching a great weight to the
bottom of the ship, to be computed, of course, as part of the ballast.
If the weight were lowered by means of a cord, so would the boat ascend,
and if the weight were raised, it would descend. The method of supplying
air to the submerged crew was equally amusing. He depended upon the
ability of men to live in a polluted atmosphere by continued practice,
or if that were found impossible, the air might be purified by what he
calls “refrigeration,” that is, by heating it by lamps and allowing it
to cool on coming in contact with the sides of the vessel, the process
being assisted by bellows. It is hoped that the theology of the
undoubtedly worthy bishop was sounder than his science, and that it
emulated rather the particularly high scale of wisdom of his political
adaptability. But no matter how ridiculous his details, he,
nevertheless, left the main idea more firmly implanted in men’s minds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account