Such were the outlines of the constitution, as set forth by Brusque
in presence of all the men of the colony. A profound silence followed
the remarks of the orator. But, at length, a man named Rogere rose,
and said that he did not like the proposed constitution. For his part,
he did not see the necessity of any government. He had, in France
only seen iniquity, and folly, and crime, following the footsteps of
government, whether admitted by kings or citizens, and he believed
that the best way was to get along without it. “For my part,” said
he, “I believe that liberty is the greatest political good, and the
moment you begin to make laws, you put fetters upon it. As soon as you
establish a government, you prepare to smother or strangle it. Of what
use is liberty to the eagle when you have broken his wing, or to the
mountain deer when you have cut the sinews of his limbs, or to man when
it is doled out by magistrates, who may say how much we shall have,
and how we may exercise it? Take from man his liberty, and you sink
him as far as you can to the standard of the brute! Give him liberty,
and he is but little lower than the angels! Then why restrain liberty?
Why take it for granted that the first step in society is to fetter
human freedom and trench upon human rights? Let us be wiser than to be
guided by a prejudice; let us venture to depart from the beaten path,
and strike out something new. I close by moving that we dispense with
government altogether; that we rely upon the moral sense of mankind,
which rests upon an innate perception of justice. This is sufficient
for our safety and our happiness.”
Brusque was not a little disappointed to observe, as Rogere sat down,
that there was a pervading feeling of approbation of what he had said.
In vain did he oppose the views of Rogere; in vain did he show that
it was impossible for society to have order without laws, to maintain
justice, peace and security without government. In vain did he appeal
to history and the past experience of mankind. The idea of perfect
freedom was too fascinating to the majority; and the assembly finally
decided, by an overwhelming vote, to reject the proposed constitution,
and to make the experiment of living without laws or government.
The subject, however, became a matter of discussion among the people,
and they were soon divided into two parties, called the Brusqueites
and the Rogereites; the former being in favor of a government, and the
latter in favor of unlimited freedom. Things went on quietly for a
time, for the people were all French, and their good breeding seemed
to render the restraints and obligations of enacted statutes, less
important. Beside, the island abounded in fruit, and there seemed such
a supply of food, as to afford little ground for dispute as to the
possession of property. As for shelter, the climate was so mild as to
render the covering of a tent sufficient for comfort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account