Rocks and Their OriginsCole, Grenville A. J. (Grenville Arthur James)
Science
Rocks and Their Origins
Cole, Grenville A. J. (Grenville Arthur James)
Rocks
The balance of judgment as to differentiation and assimilation, which
should be regarded as parallel probabilities rather than as rival
propositions, is admirably held by C. Doelter[83], whose chapters on
this matter can be appreciated by all geologists.
It is of course possible that differentiation of type, from various
causes, has already proceeded so far in the earth's crust as to produce
noteworthy contrasts in the rocks erupted in different areas. The
interior of our globe, on Chamberlin's planetesimal hypothesis, need
not have been uniform in constitution, either at the outset or at any
subsequent time. J. W. Judd[84] has called attention to the existence
of _petrographical provinces_, a conception that has been very fruitful
in results. These provinces have been grouped by Harker[85] in two
branches, characterised respectively by rocks rich in alkalies and by
rocks rich in lime. The former branch appears to be associated with the
movements of faulting and block-structure, rather than of crumpling,
that have produced E. Suess's "Atlantic" type of coast. The rocks rich
in lime, on the other hand, are said to be characteristic of areas
that have been folded like the countries bordering the Pacific. The
names "Atlantic" and "Pacific" have consequently been given to the two
branches, but these terms seem too geographical in their suggestion.
Dewey and Flett[86] have put forward a third type of magma, giving
rise especially to albite as a primary or secondary constituent, and
characterised by the production of pillow-lavas. This type is held to
be associated with areas that have steadily subsided, without much
folding. G. Steinmann[87], however, has connected the spilites and
"ophiolitic" rocks with regions of intense over-folding.
So far, there are many cases where it is difficult to assign a
petrographic province to one or other of these branches, and the system
seems to demand more simplicity within the provinces than nature is
prepared to yield.
Whatever the causes of variation, it is necessary to mark out by names
certain kinds of igneous material, and it is generally accepted that
the types thus set up are best based on chemical composition. At the
same time, the minerals present in the rock, and also its structure,
record certain phases of its history, and deserve an important place in
any system of classification. The natural history of an igneous rock
is concerned with its mode of occurrence, and no isolated specimen can
satisfy the geological investigator. In the field, the porphyritic
crystals, which have an important influence on the total chemical
composition, may be found to be strangers to the magma, and to have
been derived from some mass imperfectly absorbed. The dark flecks and
patches in a granitoid rock, so often ascribed, somewhat mysteriously,
to local "segregation" in the magma, again and again prove to be
metamorphosed and minutely injected fragments of foreign rocks[88].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account