Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
111. SCRIBNER AND M’BERTY’S EXPERIMENT. SOURCE OF X-RAYS DETERMINED BY
INTERCEPTION OF ASSUMED RECTILINEAR RAYS FROM THE CATHODE. _Elect.
Eng._, N.Y., Apr. 8, ’96, p. 358; _Amer. Inst. Elec. Eng._, Mar. 25,
’96. _West. Branch._—Refer now solely to Fig. 1, S. and M.’s experiment.
Notice the relative arrangement of the elements. First, the discharge
tube with the cathode at the upper part and the phosphorescent spot
opposite thereto; then below a thick lead plate with a single opening;
then a second lead plate with two small openings placed laterally at
such a distance that if there were rectilinear rays from the cathode
they could not strike (by passing through the small hole), the covered
photographic plate which was the next element in order. The description
did not state that the photographic plate was covered, but the
experimenters must have had the usual opaque cover upon it or else the
luminous rays could have produced images. The developed plate showed two
spots strongly acted upon and surrounded by portions which were less
acted upon, the same as would be produced by light radiating from a
surface as distinguished from a point. From the fact that they stated
that the exposures were very long, it may be concluded also that the
plates were covered by a material opaque to ordinary light. Measurement
showed that the rays which produced the images came from the
phosphorescent spot (§ 106, 109, 114, 131, 139) and not from the cathode
directly by rectilinear propagation.
[Illustration:
S. & M.’S EXPERIMENT, FIG. 1. & 2.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account