Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
112. SOURCE ON INNER SURFACE OF THE DISCHARGE TUBE DETERMINED BY
PIN-HOLE IMAGES. Reference may now be made to S. and M.’s Experiment,
Fig. 2.—The discharge tube has, as before, a cathode on one side, and
the phosphorescent spot during operation on the opposite side. Lead
plates were provided in positions indicated by the heavy black straight
lines, there being a pin hole in each one. Behind these lead plates,
measured from the discharge tube, were the covered photographic plates,
as indicated. By measurement, it was afterwards determined that
practically all the X-rays started from the phosphorescent spot. The
electrode was put in an oblique position, as indicated, so that the same
would not obstruct any X-rays trying to pass through the pin hole in the
uppermost plate. The experiment served specifically to show that the
X-rays started from the inner surface of the glass, because images
produced on the upper and lower plates were equally strong. Perrin also
found that the X-rays are developed at the interior sides of the tubes.
(_Comptes Rendus_, Mar. 23, ’96. From trans. by L. M. P.) The rays, in
producing each image, had to pass through an equal thickness of glass.
If the rays had come from the outer surface, for example, two
thicknesses would have been traversed by the rays striking the upper
plate, and no thickness by those impinging upon the lower plate. That no
rays came from any other portion or element of the discharge tube was
evident, because a picture of the phosphorescent spot was the only one
produced, and this picture was inverted, as usual, with pin hole
cameras. (A pin-hole camera is the same as any other, with the lens
replaced by a very small hole, which acts as a lens.)
In the way of further evidence, if not enough already, Meslans early
determined that the phosphorescent spot on the glass is the source of
X-rays (_Comptes Rendus_, Feb. 24, ’96. From Trans. by Mr. Louis M.
Pignolet).
JEAN PERRIN’S EXPERIMENTS. THE ORIGIN OF X-RAYS. _Comptes Rendus_, Mar
23, ’96. From Trans. by Louis M. Pignolet.—He also confirmed that X-rays
radiate from the phosphorescent spot.
112_a_. DE HEEN’S EXPERIMENT. THE ANODE BELIEVED TO BE THE SOURCE OF
X-RAYS. _Comptes Rendus_, Feb. 17, ’96. From trans. by Louis M.
Pignolet.—A lead screen, pierced by several holes, was placed between
the discharge tube and the photographic plate. The shadows of the holes
on the plate indicated that the rays emanate from the positive pole of
the tube.
As both Thomson (E.) and Rowland, as well as De Heen, at first concluded
likewise, is it not probable that the anode was struck by the cathode
rays (see § § 113, 116)? For it was fully admitted that the anode,
otherwise, does not emit X-rays.
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account