Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
87. DOUBLE REFRACTION AND POLARIZATION.—Neither could he detect any
action upon the rays by way of refraction by Iceland spar at whatever
angle the crystal was placed. As to this property of light see Huygen’s
Works of 1690 and Malus’ Works of 1810. quartz also gave negative
results. Prof. Mayer of Stevens Institute submitted to _Sci._, Mar. 27,
’96, the report of a crucial test for showing the non-polarization of
X-rays. On six discs of glass, 0.15 mm. thick and 25 mm. in diameter,
were placed very thin plates of Herapath’s iodo-sulphate of quinine. The
axes of these crystals crossed one another at various angles. When the
axes of two plates were crossed at right angles no light was
transmitted; the overlapping surfaces of the plates appearing black. If
the Roentgen rays be polarizable, the Herapath crystals, crossed at
right angles, should act as lead and not allow any of the Roentgen rays
to be transmitted. Prof. Mayer is well known as exceedingly expert in
connection with minute measurements and in the manipulation of
scientific experiments. Dr. Morton, Pres. Stevens Inst., attested the
results as an absolute demonstration that X-rays are incapable of
polarization. _Stevens Indicator_, Jan., ’96.
88. THE PROPAGATION OF X-RAYS RECTILINEAR.—There would be no difficulty
in producing photographs of the bones of the hand with the rays of
light, if it were not for the tremendous amount of reflection and
refraction causing so much diffusion that no sharply defined shadow of
the bones would be produced. By means of a powerful lens and a funnel
pointed into a dark room, the author noticed that the condensed light
thereby obtained when passed through the hand, and when the incident
rays were parallel, came out so diffused that one would think that the
light went through bones as easily as any part of the hand. An
experiment of this kind serves to emphasize that the success of
sciagraphy by X-rays is due not only to the great penetrating power, but
to practically no refraction nor reflection. In view of the sharp
shadows cast of objects even when located in vegetable or animal media,
Roentgen was justified in giving the name of ray to the energy. He
tested the sharpness of the shadow by making sciagraphs and fluorescent
pictures not only of the bones of the hand, but of a wire wound upon a
bobbin, of a set of weights in a box, of a compass, card and needle,
conveniently closed in a metal case, and of the elements of a
non-homogeneous metal. To prove the rectilinear propagation further, he
received the image of the discharge tube upon a photographic plate by
means of a pinhole camera. The picture was faint but unmistakable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account