Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
89. INTERFERENCE. The rays of light may be caused to interfere with each
other. See _Newton’s Principia_, Vol. III.; _Young’s Works_, Vol.
I.—Theory points out that waves of ether of two pencils of light, when
caused to be propagated at certain relative phases partially or wholly
neutralize or strengthen each other. Roentgen could obtain no
interference effects of the X-rays, but did not conclude that the
interference property was absent. He was not satisfied with the
intensity of the rays and therefore could not test the matter severely.
[Illustration:
FIG. L.
]
90. ELECTRIFIED BODIES DISCHARGED BY X-RAYS. p. 47.—After Roentgen’s
first announcement, others, and probably J. J. Thomson as the first,
found that the X-rays would discharge both negatively and positively
electrified bodies. Roentgen, in his second announcement, stated that he
had already made such a discovery, but had not carried the investigation
far enough to report satisfactorily on the details. At last he put forth
an account of the whole phenomena and stated that the discharge varied
somewhat with the intensity of the rays, which was tested in each
instance by the relative luminosity of the fluorescent screen, and by
the relative darkness produced upon the photographic plate in several
instances. Electrified bodies, whether conductors or insulators, were
discharged when placed in the path of the rays. All bodies whatsoever
behaved in the same manner when charged. They were all discharged
equally by the X-rays. He noticed that “If an electrical conductor is
surrounded by a solid insulator such as paraffin instead of by air, the
radiation acts as if the insulating envelope were swept by a flame
connected to earth.” Upon surrounding said paraffin by a conductor
connected to earth, the radiation no longer acted on the inner
electrified conductor. The above observations led him to believe that
the action was indirect and had something to do with the air through
which the X-rays passed. In order to prove this, it was necessary for
him to show that air ought to be able to discharge the bodies if first
subjected to the rays, and then passed over the bodies. The apparatus
for performing an experiment to test this prediction is shown in Fig. L,
which serves to illustrate also the manner in which he prevented
electro-static influences of the discharge tube, leading in wires and
induction coil. § 71, near centre. For this purpose he built a large
room in which the walls were of zinc covered with lead. The door for his
entrance and exit was arranged to be closed in an air-tight manner. In
the side wall opposite the door there was a slit 4 cm. wide, covered
hermetically with a thin sheet of aluminum for the entrance of X-rays
from the vacuum tube outside of the room. All the electrical apparatus
connected with the generation of the X-rays was outside of the room. No
force whatever came into the room, therefore, except the X-rays through
the aluminum. § 71.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account