Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
In order to show that air which had been subjected
to the X-rays would discharge a body immediately afterwards upon coming
in contact therewith, he arranged matters so that the air was propelled
by an aspirator. He passed air along a tube made of thick metal so that
the rays could enter only through a small aluminum window near the open
end. At over a distance of 20 cm. from the window was an insulated ball
charged with electricity, and connected to any electroscope or
electrometer. The professor used a Hankel electroscope. No published
sketch was made by Roentgen; therefore, that shown in the figure was
produced by inference from the description. The operation was as
follows: The X-rays passed into the room through the aluminum window,
and then into the metal tube through its aluminum window. When the air
was at rest, the ball was not discharged. When the aspirator was at
work, however, so that the air moved past the aluminum window and past
the ball, the latter was discharged whether electrified positively or
negatively. He modified the operation by maintaining the ball at a
constant potential by means of accumulators, while the air which had
been treated by X-rays was passed by the ball. “An electric current was
started as if the ball had been connected with the wall of the tube by a
bad conductor.” He was not sure whether the air would retain its power
to discharge bodies as long as it remained out of contact with any
bodies. He determined, however, that any slight “disturbance” of the air
by a body having a large surface and not electrified, rendered the air
inoperative. He illustrated this by saying that “If one pushes, for
example, a sufficiently thick plug of cotton-wool so far into the tube
that the air which has been traversed by the rays must stream through
the cotton-wool before it reaches the ball, the charge of the ball
remains unchanged when suction is commenced.” With the cotton-wool
immediately in front of the window, it had no effect, showing,
therefore, that dust particles in the air are not the cause of the
communication of the force of the discharge from the X-rays to the
electrified body. Very fine wire gauze in several thicknesses also
prevented the air from discharging the body when placed between the
aluminum window and the ball within the thick metal tube, as in the case
of the cotton plug. Similar experiments were instituted with dry
hydrogen instead of air, and, as far as he could discern, the bodies
were equally well discharged, except possibly a little slower in
hydrogen. He experienced difficulty in obtaining equally powerful X-rays
at different times. All experimenters are acquainted with this
difficulty. Further, he called attention also to the thin layer of air
which clings to the surface of the bodies, and which, therefore, plays
an appreciable part in connection with the discharge. § 16, near end. In
order to test the matter further as to discharge of electrified bodies,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account