Roger Williams, Prophet and Pioneer of Soul-LibertyStrickland, Arthur Barsazou
Religion
Roger Williams, Prophet and Pioneer of Soul-Liberty
Strickland, Arthur Barsazou
Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683
Here is a candid avowal that justice was refused to Salem, on the
question of civil right, as a punishment for the conduct of church and
pastor. A volume could not more forcibly illustrate the danger of a
connection between the civil and ecclesiastical power.
[Illustration: Pembroke College Reduced from Loggan’s print, taken
about 1688]
Teacher and people at Salem were indignant, and a letter was addressed
to the churches of the colony in protest against such injustice. The
churches were asked to admonish the magistrates and deputies within
their membership. These churches refused or neglected to do this. In
some cases the letters never came before the church. Williams then
called on his own church to withdraw communion with such churches. It
declined to do this, and he withdrew from the Salem church, preaching
his last sermon, August 19, 1635. Here was a repetition of the first
conflict. Straus writes:
Here stood the one church already condemned, with sentence
suspended over it. Against it were arrayed the aggregate power of
the colony--its nine churches, the priests, and the magistrates.
What could the Salem church and community do, threatened with
disfranchisement, its deputies excluded from the General Court, and
its petition for land to which it was entitled, denied? Dragooned into
submission it had to abandon its persecuted minister to struggle alone
against the united power of Church and State. To deny Williams the
merit of devotion to a principle in this contest, wherein there was
no alternative but retraction or banishment, is to belie history in
order to justify bigotry, and to convert martyrdom into wrong-headed
obstinacy. This is exactly what Cotton sought to do in his version of
the controversy given ten years later in order to vindicate himself
and his church brethren from the stigma of their acts in the eyes of
a more enlightened public opinion in England. Williams pursued no
half-hearted or half-way measures. He stood unshaken upon the firm
ground of his convictions, and declared to the Salem church that he
could no longer commune with them, thereby entirely separating himself
from them and them from him.
He went so far as to refuse to commune with his own wife in the new
communion which he formed in his own home, until she would completely
withdraw from the Salem church.
The time for the next General Court drew near. The Salem church letter
and Williams’ withdrawal from his church made his foes determined to
crush him. They had thoughts of putting him to death.
[Illustration: Fac-simile from Original Records of the Order for the
Banishment of Roger Williams.]
[Sidenote: 1635. 3rd Sept.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account