Families -- Fiction; Theater -- Great Britain -- Fiction
“Thirty-three is hardly middle-age,” said Kenrick. “I was thinking of
the chilly forties. Besides, you can’t compare women with men in this
matter. The old saw about a woman being as old as she looks and a man
as old as he feels is always used by women as an illustration of the
advantage of being a man. As a matter of fact, the advantage lies all
the other way. It is so much easier to look young than to feel young. A
woman is never too old to be loved. You can hardly maintain that a man
is never to old to love. I doubt if a man over thirty ever knows what
love means.”
“Och, I never heard such a preposterous statement,” Nancy declared.
“Why, think of the men who cherish hopeless passions all their lives.”
“For my part I can never understand a man’s cherishing a hopeless
passion,” he declared. “I should feel so utterly humiliated by a
woman’s refusal of her love that my own passion would be killed by it
instantly. And the humiliation would be deepened by my knowledge of
woman’s facility for falling in love, which is, of course, much greater
than a man’s, as much greater as her fastidiousness and sensitiveness
are less. To be refused by a woman, when one sees on what monstrous
objects she is prepared to lavish her affection, seems to me terrible.
Equally I do not understand why a woman, who after her childhood so
rarely cherishes a hopeless passion that will never be returned, is
always prepared to cherish the much more hopeless passion of continuing
to love a man after he has ceased to love her. I suppose it’s because
women are such sensualists. They always regard love as a gratification
of self too long postponed, and they continue to want it as children
want broken toys and men fail to give up smoking. The famous women who
have held men have held them by their infinite variety. Yet the one
quality in a lover that a woman finds it hardest to forgive is his
variety.”
“Och, I don’t agree at all,” Nancy declared breathlessly. “In fact I
don’t agree with anything you’ve said about love or men or women. I
think it’s a great pity that you have let yourself grow middle-aged.
You wouldn’t be able to have all these ideas if you were still capable
of feeling genuine emotion. I’m not clever enough to argue with
you properly. No woman ever can argue, because either she feels so
strongly about a subject that all her reasons fly to the wind, or, if
she doesn’t feel strongly, she doesn’t think it worth while to argue
and, in fact, finds it a boring waste of time. But I feel that you are
utterly wrong. I know you are. You’re just wrong. And that’s all there
is to be said. My husband had more variety than any man I ever knew,
and I loved his variety as much as I loved every other single one of
his qualities.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account