Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
If we look round for other possible solutions, we find two faintly
foreshadowed, but both doomed to failure. The first was a reformed
Senate, not merely the existing body artificially bolstered up, as it had
been by Sulla, but a body really made representative of Italy through
the free inclusion of _novi homines_. The idea was held by Cicero, but
no scheme was ever considered which would have made it a reality. For
such an object to be attained, election to those magistracies from
which the Senate was recruited must cease to be in the hands of the
Roman _comitia_; but no one to our knowledge, with the exception of
the Emperor Augustus, thought of the possibility of election by the
municipal towns.[1561] Help might also have been looked for from a
reformed assembly, one that had been made representative of the whole
Italian people. The allies nearly worked out this means of salvation for
themselves,[1562] but the magnitude of Rome was itself a stumbling-block
to the solution of the problem on federal lines. We can hardly blame the
thinkers of the day for not seeing the possibility of a representative
assembly of a national kind; for the Italian, like the Greek mind, though
familiar enough with the idea of the representation of cities, had not
advanced to the conception of the representation of individuals through
electoral districts.
The reason why the creation of an Italian senate or an Italian
assembly might have warded off the monarchy is that such a body might
have commanded respect even from the army of the provinces. This
correspondence in sentiment might, it is true, have required that the
army should remain mainly Italian; and Augustus’ attempt to give Italy
something of a representative character may have been abandoned through
fear of a conflict between an army which was becoming provincial in
personnel and an Italian proletariate, when the choice of a Princeps had
to be decided. Yet, although circumstances were hostile to a fusion of
Italy and the provinces, and the Principate was not to be Italian, one
should not forget that it had something of a popular character. The Roman
citizens of the legions who made the Princeps[1563] were of a better type
than the _plebs urbana_ of Rome; for not only was the freedman element
eliminated, but discipline had with them replaced demoralisation, their
life was lived under healthier influences, and although they were often
moved to their selection by a mere _esprit de corps_, they generally
succeeded in placing a very capable man on the throne.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account