Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
The QUAESTORS still maintained their functions as financial officials and
general assistants to the magistrates. Their number had been raised by
Caesar to forty, but was again reduced to twenty by Augustus.[1736] For
a time two quaestors had the guardianship of the _aerarium_,[1737] and
others were in the public provinces the financial and judicial assistants
of the proconsuls.[1738] Four more were assigned to the consuls, two to
each, as their agents and assistants;[1739] while the Princeps himself
employed two, commended by himself (_quaestores Augusti_, _quaestores
candidati principis_), chiefly for the purpose of reading his despatches
to the Senate.[1740] During the reign of Claudius a step was taken which
“put up the quaestorship for sale,”[1741] and associated it with a
function that clung to it longer than any other. This was the exhibition
of gladiatorial games at the cost of the exhibitor,[1742] a pecuniary
burden which henceforth fell on every aspirant for higher office, until
Severus Alexander ordained that only the _quaestores candidati_ should
themselves defray the expenses of these spectacles, the cost of the games
given by the others being defrayed from the _fiscus_.[1743]
The TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS were not colleagues of the Princeps, for the
_tribunica potestas_ was not the tribunate, and the actions in virtue
of it were not even theoretically subject to the tribunes’ veto. But
their great negative powers were still occasionally exercised in some
departments of state during the first century of the Principate. Like
the office itself, however, they were but a shadow of those of the
Republic.[1744] The _intercessio_ against decrees of the Senate might
be attempted when unimportant matters, such as the right to scourge
actors, were under discussion,[1745] or might be employed as a warning
to the Senate that the Princeps should be consulted on the business
in hand.[1746] In higher matters of state its exercise might mean
danger or death to the tribune who mistook the fictitious for the real
Republic, or who, recognising the tyranny, chose to brave the anger of
the Emperor.[1747] The right of _auxilium_ was still exercised against a
praetor in 56 A.D.,[1748] and appealed to by an Emperor in 69.[1749] But
this, too, soon disappeared to leave no trace. In the early Principate
the tribunes seem to have possessed some right of summoning civil cases
from the Italian towns to Rome,[1750] probably through an exercise of
the veto; and, although their criminal jurisdiction had disappeared with
the _comitia_, they retained some power of inflicting fines (_multae_),
which was limited during the reign of Nero.[1751] There is also evidence
that they still possessed the right of veto in civil jurisdiction.[1752]
Amongst positive powers their presidency of the Senate still survives, as
we shall see in dealing with that body.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account