Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
First, we may notice that even in later times the immediate heirs of a
man were regarded as having a claim to property, a kind of potential
ownership, during the lifetime of the _pater_, and that inheritance is
regarded merely as a continuation of ownership (_dominium_);[101] and in
accordance with this view we find the practice of holding an inheritance
in joint ownership, the co-heirs bearing the name of _consortes_.[102]
Secondly, the earliest testaments of which we have knowledge were
public acts performed before the _comitia_ of the people. The most
ancient was the patrician form of testament—the _testamentum comitiis
calatis_—effected at the _comitia curiata_ which were summoned
(_calata_) twice a year for this purpose.[103] The original purpose of
this public testament is obscure. It is possible that originally it
took place when there was no direct heir (_suus heres_) to receive the
inheritance, and that it was accompanied by some form of adoption of
a successor. The person adopted might have been the son belonging to
another family; although of such a procedure there is no further trace in
Roman law.[104]
The publicity of the act and the infrequency of its occurrence show
how exceptional a will must have been, and that the normal mode of
succession was that by intestacy. But we have no warrant for saying
that this testament at the _comitia calata_ was an act of private
legislation and was permitted by the assembled burgesses. The gathering
was perhaps merely a form, and the persons assembled may have acted only
as witnesses;[105] but the very publicity would have made it almost
impossible to pass over a son of the family, unless there were expressed
grounds for his disinheritance.
The second kind of public will was the military testament (_in
procinctu_),[106] but our authorities leave us in doubt as to whether
this testament could be made in any gathering of the soldiers prepared to
meet the enemy and in any place, or whether it was a formal act possible
only in the great gathering of the _exercitus_ in the Campus Martius—that
gathering which was finally organised as a legislative assembly, existed
by the side of the assembly of the Curies, and came to be known as the
_comitia centuriata_.
In the first case it may have been an old patrician form of testament, an
informal will permitted in an emergency, perhaps to enable a childless
soldier to transmit his inheritance. We do not know whether it had
absolute validity, or only a validity dependent on circumstances, such as
the absence of direct heirs, or the satisfaction of religious conditions
approved by subsequent pontifical scrutiny; on this hypothesis the
comrades of the testator could hardly have acted other than as witnesses
to the will.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account