Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
We cannot trace the successive steps in the acquisition of power by the
centuries or its growth from an army into a _comitia_. They must have
been the chief political changes which filled the closing years of the
monarchy and the early days of the Republic; for even the abolition of
monarchy itself, revolutionary as it was, was less of an alteration
in the structure of the constitution than this transference of the
attributes of sovereignty from one assembly to another, from a single
to a mixed order. The _comitia curiata_ was not suddenly stripped of
its powers; but the organising genius of a single supreme magistrate
had prepared the way for a change, which was a prototype of the gradual
insensible revolutions through which Rome was to pass.
The change which closes the history of this period, although not so
radical, was far more sudden and violent. The monarchy itself was
overthrown. History has tried to invest this revolution with all the
legal grounds and legal forms which it could summon to its assistance.
Servius had had it in his mind to complete his democratic work by laying
down the full _imperium_;[311] and Tarquin the Proud, the last of the
great Etruscan line, had broken through the constitutional usages of
the monarchy[312] and had ruled without challenging the allegiance of
the people.[313] That there was some fearful abuse of the kingly power,
typified in the associations that gathered round the words _rex_ and
_regnum_ and in the oath which made any one who aspired to monarchy an
outlaw,[314] we may without hesitation allow; for Rome, as shown by the
power she continued to entrust to her magistrates, had not outgrown the
idea of royalty. But there was no constitutional mode of deposing a king.
The auspices had returned to the fathers in unhallowed fashion, and the
war waged by Tarquin and Etruria is a war for the maintenance of the
principle of divine right. But yet Rome held that the divinity of the
magistracy still remained; the auspices again left the fathers’ hands and
were conferred on two citizens chosen from the _patres_.[315]
CHAPTER II
THE GROWTH OF THE REPUBLICAN CONSTITUTION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account