Rube Burrow, king of outlaws, and his band of train robbers : $b An accurate and faithful history of their exploits and adventuresAgee, George W. (George Washington)
History
Rube Burrow, king of outlaws, and his band of train robbers : $b An accurate and faithful history of their exploits and adventures
Agee, George W. (George Washington)
Burrow, Rube, 1854-1890
[Illustration: DETECTIVE T. V. JACKSON.]
CHAPTER XIII.
THE CAPTURE OF RUBE SMITH AND JAMES M’CLUNG AT AMORY, MISS.--
M’CLUNG’S CONFESSION--A PLAN TO ROB THE TRAIN FALLS
THROUGH--A SAFE ROBBERY NIPPED IN THE BUD.
When the Buckatunna robbery of September 25, 1889, occurred, the fact
that three men participated in that deed proved that a third man had
joined Rube Burrow since his last robbery at Duck Hill, on December
15, 1888, and the identity of the third man puzzled the detectives
of the Express Company for some weeks. An accurate description,
however, of all three of the men had been obtained, and Detective
Thomas Jackson, after a visit into Lamar County a few weeks after the
robbery, became convinced that it was Rube Smith. On the eighth day
of October, succeeding the Buckatunna robbery, Rube Smith appeared
in Lamar County, exhibited a good deal of money, and was known to be
in hiding in the vicinity of his father’s home. Here he remained for
some weeks, narrowly escaping capture at the hands of Detective Thomas
Jackson several times, while the latter was daily securing additional
evidence of his complicity in the Buckatunna affair. Finally, in the
latter part of November, 1889, Jim McClung, an old acquaintance of Rube
Smith’s, left Itawamba County, Miss., to visit his relatives in Lamar
County, and while _en route_ thither fell in with Rube Smith near the
house of that worthy’s father. Rube exhibited quite a sum of money to
McClung, and invited him to accompany him to the Indian Territory,
which McClung agreed to do. This was the hiding place to which Smith
had gone soon after the Johnson robbery.
The two men left for the Indian Territory. Their destination was
Kavanaugh, and Smith unfolded to McClung, while _en route_, the whole
story of the Buckatunna train robbery and the part he played in it. He
described every detail and circumstance of the robbery, and McClung,
having a very retentive memory, was afterwards enabled to testify
about it so minutely that the jury in the Federal Court, before which
Smith had a mistrial in May, 1890, concluded that Jim McClung had
participated in that robbery. Such, however, was not the fact.
The section of the Indian Territory to which Smith and McClung went
was wild and sparsely settled, but no sooner had Smith appeared there
than he learned that the officers were after him for a violation of
the Federal law forbidding the importation and sale of intoxicating
liquors in the Indian Territory, while he was there in the early
spring. Smith therefore left within twenty-four hours after his
arrival, and returned to Lamar County, abandoning a project of robbing
the disbursing officer of an Indian agency near Kavanaugh, which he had
unfolded to McClung.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account