ENTASIS.—A slightly convex curvature given in
execution to the outline of the shaft of a column,
just sufficient to counteract and correct the
appearance, or fancied appearance, of curvature in
a contrary direction (_i. e._ concavely), which
might else take place and cause the middle of the
shaft to appear thinner than it really is. Entasis
is therefore nothing _positive_: it is not intended
to show itself, for were it to do so,—were there to
be any visible swelling,—it would be a deformity;
yet such deformity has been studiously adopted by
many Modern Architects, merely, it would seem, for
the sake of making evident that at all events they
took pains to guard against an imaginary defect.
The subject of entasis has been made one of those
_nugæ difficiles_ which those who can do nothing
else make great parade with. To such, then, be
left all such sublimated transcendental niceties.
If a column only 30 or 40 feet high would appear
thinner in the middle than it really is, unless
there made somewhat thicker than it would be were
its profile a straight line, the same appearance
would take place in any other lofty object, and in
a greater degree in proportion to actual height; so
that a tower of great loftiness, both positively
and proportionally, _ought_—unless entasis were
given it, to look thinner in the middle than at top
and bottom. If such appearance really does take
place, it is one perfectly in accordance with the
laws of vision, therefore no more than a natural
and perfectly proper one. In all such cases the
judgment corrects the eye, and prevents mistakes.
It would, in fact, require a very great stretch of
imagination to fancy what we know to be straight,
and of the same breadth throughout, is not so:
if we can fancy that, we can also fancy that the
further end of a building is not so high as the
nearer one, and that instead of being horizontal,
the cornices slope downwards. So much for the
fuss made about entasis, including that about the
hypothetical curvature in the horizontal lines of
the Parthenon, where curvature was administered, if
administered at all, in an exceedingly homœopathic
ratio.
EPISTYLIUM.—The architrave or horizontal course resting
immediately upon the columns. Hence we should
denote as _Epistylar Arcuation_ that system in
which columns support arches instead of horizontal
architraves and entablatures. See p. 75.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account