Rule of the Monk; Or, Rome in the Nineteenth CenturyGaribaldi, Giuseppe
History
Rule of the Monk; Or, Rome in the Nineteenth Century
Garibaldi, Giuseppe
Italian fiction -- Translations into English; Rome (Italy) -- History -- 1798-1870 -- Fiction
He hates the priesthood as a lying and mischievous institution, but
is ready, so soon as they divest themselves of their malignity and
buffoonery, to welcome them with open arms to a nobler vocation, a new
but honest profession, and to urge men to pardon their past offenses,
conforming in this, as in other acts, to a spirit of universal
tolerance. Though not suffering them as priests, he pities and yearns
towards them as men; for priests he regards as the assassins of the
soul, and in that light esteems them more culpable than those who slay
the body. He has passed his life in the hope of seeing the populations
ennobled, and to the extent of his power, has championed always and
everywhere their rights, but sadly confesses that he has lived partly in
a false hope; for more than one nation, raised to freedom and light
by Providence, has paltered again with despotism, whose rulers become
perhaps even more unjust and arbitrary than the patrician.
Still, this man never despairs of the ultimate amelioration of mankind,
albeit he is deeply grieved at the slowness of its coming. He regards
as the worst enemies of the liberty of the people those democratic
_doctrinnaires_ who have preached and still preach revolution, not as
a terrible remedy, a stern Nemesis, but as a trade carried on for their
own advancement He believes that these same mercenaries of liberty have
ruined many republics, and brought dishonor upon the republican system.
Of this there is a striking example in the great and glorious French
Republic of 1789, which is held up at the present day as a scarecrow by
despots and their crew against those who maintain the excellence of
the popular system. He defines a perfect republic to be a government of
honest and virtuous people by honesty and virtue, and illustrates his
definition by pointing to the downfall of all republics when people have
eschewed virtue and turned away towards vice. But he does not believe in
a republican government composed of five hundred governors.
He considers that the liberty of a nation consists in the people
choosing their own government, and that this government should be
dictatorial or presidential; that is to say, directed by one man alone.
To such an institution the greatest people in the world owed their
greatness. But woe be to those who, instead of a Cincinnatus, elect
a Cæsar! The Dictatorship should be limited to a fixed period, and
prolonged only in extraordinary cases, like that in the authority of
Abraham Lincoln in the late war of the United States. It must be guarded
by popular rights and public opinion from becoming either excessive or
hereditary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account