But, though neither Wilmot nor Percy were estimable characters, Goring
was no better, and the result of these drastic measures was only to
render the state of Court and {156} Army more confused and more
factious than ever. Digby's partisans tried to lay the onus of
Wilmot's fall on Rupert, and Rupert's friends endeavoured to refer it
to Digby. Judging from Digby's own letter above quoted, Rupert, who
was absent from the King's army during the whole of the proceedings,
does not seem to have had much share in them. Certainly the Secretary
gives no hint of his collusion. "Lord Digby is the great agent to
incense the King," asserted Arthur Trevor. "My Lord Wilmot undertakes
to turn the tables on him, and so the wager is laid head to head.
Daniel O'Neil goeth his share in that hazard, for certainly the Lord
Digby hath undone his credit with the King... And truly I look upon
Daniel O'Neil as saved only out of want of leisure to dispose of him.
Prince Rupert and Will Legge are his severe enemies; and so is
Ashburnham."[5] Critical indeed was the position of the unlucky Daniel,
who had been so lately the "dear and intimate friend" of Digby. Owing,
as he explained to Ormonde, to "the unfortunate falling out of my two
best friends," he had fallen between two stools. Wilmot he considered
most to blame, for he had endeavoured to render Digby "odious to the
army and to all honest people."[6] The army had been on the very point
of petitioning against the Secretary when he forestalled the move by
the unexpected arrest of his adversary. "How guilty he will be, I know
not," was the conclusion of O'Neil. "But sure I am that the accusing
of him was not seasonable, and his commitment less... and two friends I
have lost!"[7] Wilmot himself seems to have directed his animus
principally against Rupert. He was unwilling to stand his trial, and
was therefore permitted to join the Queen, then in France. There he
found the Marquess of Newcastle, whom he hoped to secure as an ally
against the Prince. "I understand from one coming from Wilmot," wrote
{157} Trevor, "that he and the Marquess of Newcastle are preparing a
charge against Prince Rupert, and will be at the next advice of
Parliament at Oxford, where their party will be great,--the Marquess of
Hertford, Lord Herbert--you may guess the rest. Prince Rupert and
Daniel O'Neil are inconsistent in this state."[8]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account