The proposed accusation of Rupert was never made, and was probably a
figment of Wilmot's brain. Neither Hertford nor Herbert (with whom
Rupert had clashed as President of Wales) had any love for the Prince,
but they were both too loyal to increase the King's difficulties by
factious action. And indeed in the spring of 1645, we find Hertford,
Rupert, and Ashburnham in close alliance against Digby and Cottington;
the three first desiring a treaty with the Parliament, and the other
two opposing it. O'Neil was easily convinced that Wilmot owed his fall
to Rupert, and in October 1644 he wrote to Ormonde: "Prince Rupert,
whoe is nowe knowen to bee the primum mobile of that mischeef, iss
strangely unsatisfied with Wilmot's resolutione. For he thought to
make use of this occatione to ruine Lord Digby; but, his project
fayling, he plays the Courtier and iss reconsyled, whiche iss a great
hapines to the King."[9]
The truth was that, were the charges against them true or false, Wilmot
and Percy did really owe their downfall to the hatred of Rupert and
Digby. The Secretary had been the actual agent in the matter, but
Rupert approved and supported his action. The two were willing enough
to unite against their enemies, and they would have been equally
willing to ruin each other. But for a time Rupert endeavoured, for his
uncle's sake, to curb his hatred of the Secretary. In August the King
had exhorted his nephew earnestly to make friends with Digby; "whom I
must desire you (for my service, and because he is a useful servant) to
countenance so far as to show him a possibility to recover {158} your
favour, if he shall deserve it... Not doubting but, for my sake, ye
will make this, or a greater, experiment... I must protest to you, on
the faith of a Christian--the reason of this protest I refer to Robin
Legge--that as concerning your generosity and particular fidelity and
friendship to me, I have an implicit faith in you."[10] This
passionate protest was caused by the libels circulated against the
Prince, some of which had reached the King's ears. For a while Rupert
was pacified, and he made overtures of tolerance to Digby, who
responded fluently that his previous unhappiness as the object of
Rupert's aversion, would now serve only to increase his joy and
satisfaction in the Prince's confidence and friendship.[11] "Rupert
and Digby are friends; but I doubt they trust one another alike!"[12]
was the Prince's own view of the matter, as expressed to Will Legge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account