But with all his haste Rupert came too late. Aston had been
incapacitated by a severe wound, and the command had fallen to his
subordinate, Colonel Fielding. Ignorant of the King's long delayed
advance to his relief, Fielding made a truce with Essex, in order to
treat; consequently, when the King and Rupert arrived and fell upon
Essex, Fielding could not, in honour, sally to their assistance. The
relief party perforce retired, and Rupert sent to demand of Essex the
name of a gentleman who had very valiantly attacked him in the
retreat.[13] After this failure, there was nothing left but to
surrender, and Fielding accepted Essex's permission to march out with
the honours {107} of war. But Essex was unable to prevent a breach of
the articles by his soldiers, who attacked and insulted the Royalist
garrison. This faithless conduct was bitterly remembered by the
Royalists, and subsequently repaid in kind at Bristol and Newark. As
for the unfortunate Fielding, he was tried by court-martial, and
condemned to death for his untimely surrender of his charge. But
Rupert, who fully understood his difficult position, was resolved that
he should not suffer, and urged the young Prince of Wales to plead with
the King for his life.[14] The little Prince's intercession prevailed,
and Fielding was spared. Throughout the rest of the war he served as a
volunteer, but, though he displayed great gallantry, his reputation
never recovered the unfortunate miscarriage at Reading.
The vicinity of Essex's army detained Rupert for some time at Oxford.
From that centre he and his picked troops carried on an active guerilla
warfare, scouring the country on all sides. "They took many prisoners
who thought themselves secure, and put them to ransom. And this they
did by night marches, through unfrequented ways, often very near
London." At the same time Rupert had to attend to a voluminous
correspondence with his officers in all parts of the country. The
generals, Crafurd, Newcastle, Maurice, and others demanded his orders.
Lord Northampton appealed to him for relief from the exorbitant demands
made on his tenantry by Colonel Croker.[15] From all sides came the
usual complaints about quarters, and supplies of provisions or
ammunition. Sir William Vavasour had a more unusual grievance. He
commanded in Wales, under Lord Herbert, but Lord Herbert, being a Roman
Catholic, could not openly exert his powers for fear of prejudicing the
King's affairs; and Digby presumed to send orders to Vavasour. "How to
behave myself in this I know not," wrote the distracted Colonel to the
Prince. "Nor do I {108} understand in what condition I myself am. My
Lord Herbert is General, and yet all despatches are directed to me;
which is not very pleasing to his Excellency."[16]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account