In the plate and jewelled ornament which we find in the treasury
of the Kremlin, we shall find that Russian taste was fond of solid
material and ornament, enriched with many and large precious stones
of value. All Oriental nations have ever loved to accumulate riches
of this description which, at the same time that they are of use
as ornament, are also of intrinsic value. The crowns, and thrones,
and sceptres, the ornaments of the imperial costume, the gold and
silver plate and vases and other precious objects of the court
of the Tsars have, therefore, a character of solid splendour, a
want of refinement and delicacy, which is almost uniformly
characteristic. Still they are not deficient in a certain grandeur
and even elegance, and in details there is much that is admirable,
much that is strikingly original.
By far the greater number of pieces that we shall find in the Kremlin
and elsewhere belong to the Seventeenth Century. In the treasury
of the Kremlin we have but one piece of the Twelfth Century and
some few of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries. All the rest
are later.
The entire number of pieces in the Kremlin amounts to sixteen hundred.
After the disasters of 1612, all the ancient plate for the service
of the Tsar's table was melted down and converted into money; many
objects in gold and silver and jewelled work being at the same time
given in pledge to the troops of Vladislas IV. There are therefore
few examples earlier than the dynasty of the Romanoffs.
The treasure contains also some of the most highly venerated icons,
crosses, and reliquaries in Russia. As regards many of these it
is difficult to assign a date or a place of production. Many of
them have histories more or less legendary, but while some may
appear to belong absolutely to the Greek school, we must not forget
that Russia sent its workmen to Mount Athos to be instructed and
to work there, and on their return the traditions and models of
the school were scrupulously observed in the workshops of Moscow.
The regalia of the ancient Tsars scarcely yield in interest to
that of any other country. They consist of a large number of crowns
or jewelled caps of peculiar form, of orbs and sceptres, of the
imperial costume, and especially of that peculiar part of the latter,
a kind of collar or shoulder ornament, known as the _barmi_.
Other important pieces of the regalia of Alexis Michailovitch are
the orbs and sceptres, the bow and arrow case of the same description
of workmanship. These are gorgeous specimens of jewelled and enamelled
work attributed to Constantinople. The sceptre of the Tsar Michailovitch
is of similar enamelled work, and is probably a good specimen of
the effect of western influence on the goldsmiths of Moscow. The
figures especially appear to be of the Italian renaissance. Another
sceptre is unmistakably Russian work, and if not of pure taste is
at least of fine workmanship and imposing magnificence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account