Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, SaghalienGriffiths, Arthur
History
Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, Saghalien
Griffiths, Arthur
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia -- History; Prisons -- Russia -- History
This is no fanciful story. Cases were of constant occurrence. Leo
Deutsch, when on his way to the Kara mines, was seriously approached by
a comrade on the march, who suggested an exchange and showed
unblushingly how it might be carried out. This man was a veteran “Ivan,”
a criminal aristocrat and dandy among his fellows; he wore a white shirt
with a gay tie under his gray overcoat, and a brightly coloured scarf
round his waist, to which his chains were cleverly attached so that they
did not rattle or incommode him when walking. The suggestion was nothing
less than a cold-blooded murder. The substitute to be provided was to
have some personal resemblance to Deutsch, and would take his place with
the other politicals one day, and disappear the next. When his body
should be picked up presently in a neighbouring stream, it would be
supposed that Deutsch had committed suicide, while in reality, still
alive and hearty, he was to be disguised as the substitute who had been
permanently “removed” to make a place for him. The price of this
atrocity was a few rubles, twenty or thirty at most, and the blood money
was to be divided among the murderers, with a large contribution to the
revenues of the union.
It was to the interest of the _artel_ to encourage these exchanges and
insist upon their punctual performance. The substitute was never
permitted to back out of his bargain. He generally belonged to the class
contemptuously styled “biscuits,” and the name suited these pale,
emaciated creatures, the pariahs of the party, upon whom fell all the
dirty, disagreeable jobs. These poor wretches had lost all power of
will, and cared for nothing but the cards that had been their ruin. They
stole all they could lay their hands on, except from the “Ivans,” who
would have retaliated with a murderous thrashing, justified on the
ground that the thief had stolen from his own people. The condition of
these “biscuits” was heart-rending, especially in bad weather, when,
clothed in rags that barely covered their nakedness, they ran rather
than walked on the line of march so as to keep themselves warm. Their
only pleasure was in gambling, when anything and everything was staked,
even the government clothing for which they were responsible and for
losing which they were punished cruelly.
Next in importance to the chief, the storekeeper was a prominent
official in the union. He had bought his place, bidding the highest
price for it when put up at auction, and he had acquired the exclusive
right to sell provisions to the prisoners, and to supply them secretly
with tobacco, spirits and playing cards. The last mentioned were in
constant use and the games were eagerly watched. When a winner was
lucky, it was customary for him to stand treat to his starving comrades.
The storekeeper also, on the expiration of his office, would entertain
everyone with a feast when the prisoners would hungrily eat their fill,
crying, “It is the storekeeper who pays.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account