Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, SaghalienGriffiths, Arthur
History
Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, Saghalien
Griffiths, Arthur
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia -- History; Prisons -- Russia -- History
Kropotkin ably summarises the objects of exile: “Students and girls
suspected of subversive ideas; writers whom it was impossible to
prosecute for their writings, but who were known to be imbued with a
‘dangerous spirit;’ workmen who were known to have spoken against the
authorities; persons who have been irreverent to some governor of a
province or _ispravnik_ were transported by hundreds every year.” The
barest denunciation and the most casual suggestion were sufficient to
afford a motive.
Several young girls were condemned, not merely to exile, but to hard
labour for from six to eight years for having given a socialistic
pamphlet to one workman. A child of fourteen became a penal colonist for
shouting aloud that it was a shame to condemn people to death for
nothing.
A flagrant case was that of M. Annenkov, a landed proprietor, who
proposed the health of the governor at a banquet given him by the
nobility of Kursk. At the end he was bold enough to remark that he
greatly hoped his excellency would devote more time to the affairs of
the province. The following week a _tarantas_ containing two gensdarmes
stopped at his door; he was arrested, was forbidden to bid his wife
farewell, and was conveyed as a prisoner to a distant part. Only after
six months and the most urgent representations of influential friends
was he again set free.
In the last decade of the reign of Alexander II, between 1870 and 1880,
administrative exile was employed with unprecedented recklessness and
the most consummate indifference to personal rights. Unlimited
discretionary powers were vested in governors of provinces. General
Todleben, in Odessa, banished all of the “untrustworthy” class without
inquiry or discrimination, and sent into exile every one whose loyalty
to the existing government was even doubtful. It was enough to be
registered as a “suspect” on the books of the secret police, or to have
been accused, even anonymously, of political disaffection. Parents who
had the most honourable record of unblemished loyalty were exiled
because their children had become revolutionists; schoolboys were exiled
because they were acquainted with some of the disaffected and had failed
to report the fact to the police; teachers were exiled for circulating
copies of a harmless magazine; members of provincial assemblies, who
claimed the right to petition the Czar for redress of grievances, were
sent across the frontier; and university students, who had been tried
and acquitted of a political offence, were re-arrested and exiled by
administrative process,—all in violation of the most elementary
principles of justice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account