Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, SaghalienGriffiths, Arthur
History
Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, Saghalien
Griffiths, Arthur
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia -- History; Prisons -- Russia -- History
A violent controversy was aroused between the enterprising and outspoken
American investigator, Mr. George Kennan, and a well-known English
explorer, Mr. H. de Windt, who undertook to contest the statements, and,
indeed, to deny the facts set forth by Mr. Kennan, plainly condemning
them as the phantasy of a disordered imagination and boldly affirming
that such a place as the Tomsk forwarding prison “does not exist.” Mr.
de Windt’s arguments are based upon the negative evidence of his own
experience. He declares that he saw nothing of the horrors described,
but then he never saw or closely inspected the prisons incriminated. He
was, no doubt, admitted to certain prisons, which he visited under the
auspices of the authorities, and he reported upon them hastily and on
imperfect knowledge. Mr. Kennan’s painful story is so completely
sustained by Russian official reports and the open condemnation of the
Siberian press, that it is entitled to full credence and may be relied
upon as absolutely trustworthy and conclusive. His account of Tiumen and
Tomsk must take a prominent place in the history of penal institutions.
The exile system called the _étapes_ or “road prisons” into being. They
were very numerous and were planted at intervals of every twenty-five or
forty miles, and as this distance was beyond the limit of a single day’s
march, half-way houses, or _polu étapes_, were to be met with regularly
along the road. Each _étape_ was the headquarters of a detachment of
soldiers who formed the convoy or escort of the convicts moving
eastward. At the _polu étapes_ there were no troops. The head of each
convoy was a commissioned officer styled the _nachalnik_.
The marching parties covered 330 miles every month, doing from fifteen
to twenty miles on two succeeding days and resting on the third. Thus a
party leaving Tomsk on Monday morning reached a _polu étape_ that night,
slept there and passed on to another regular _étape_ on Wednesday, where
they halted for twenty-four hours. On Thursday the journey was resumed
with a fresh escort, a _polu étape_ was reached that night, and a
regular _étape_ the next, and so on, day after day and week after week
for many months. Until 1883, there was no separation of the sexes on the
march, but after that date single men were excluded from the family
parties in which women and children were included. Terrible
demoralisation was previously the rule in the constantly overcrowded
_étapes_, and the grossest offences were commonly committed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account