As to the ship herself we find that the planking of a vessel of
400 tons was to be four inches thick, ships of 300 tons to have
three-inch planking, and small ships two-inch, but never less than
this. Between the beams of the deck and the orlop there were to be
six feet of head-room, and ten ports on each side upon the lower
orlop. A flagstaff was over the poop. A jeer-capstan was only to
hoist the sails of big ships, being raised by hand on small vessels.
Smith mentions using in a “faire gaile your studding sayles,” and
confirms the use of the mizzen topsail. One interesting item that
he enumerates is obviously what we now know by the name of drogue
or sea-anchor. Smith calls it a “drift sail.” Manwayring describes
the drift sail as “a sail used under water, being veered out right
ahead, having sheets to it, the use whereof is to keep a ship’s head
right upon the sea in a storme. Also it is good, where a ship drives
in fast with a current, to hinder her driving in so fast, but it is
most commonly used by fishermen in the North Seas.” Smith mentions
also the cross-jack yard as being now in use.
During James I.’s reign the East India Company, encouraged by the
King, endowed with a new charter, began to flourish considerably.
An important new vessel was built for them called the _Trade’s
Increase_, but she was careened whilst abroad at the end of her first
voyage, in order to have some repairs made to her hull. She fell
over on to her side and was burnt by the Javanese. Her size was 1100
tons, and the loss of so large a vessel in those days was a severe
blow. This was not the only occasion in which an English ship was
thrown away in this manner. Manwayring, writing of the contemporary
practice of careening, says that if a ship wanted attention below
the waterline, as for instance her seams to be caulked, when the
vessel could not be conveniently put ashore and in ports where the
tide does not dry right out, the method was to take out most of the
ballast and guns. Then by her side was brought a lower ship to which
tackles were attached, by means of which the larger vessel was hauled
down on to her side, care being taken at the same time not to strain
the masts too much. Some ships which were not naturally top-heavy
did not careen without difficulty, but English ships, having still
fairly high decks, careened somewhat easily. The Dutch, through
the shallowness of the water off their coasts, could not have a
deep draught, and in consequence their decks were not built high.
And because they were the reverse of top-heavy it was with great
difficulty that a Dutchman was careened.
[Illustration: FIG. 60. THE “PRINCE ROYAL.”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account